Revisiting the Trans-Ancestry Genetic Correlation of Refractive Error
Clark, R.; He, X.; Nguyen, T.-N.; Bui, T. H.; Noor, H.; Williams, C.; Terry, L.; Guggenheim, J. A.
Show abstract
PurposeThe prevalence of myopia varies significantly across the globe. This may be a consequence of differences in exposure to lifestyle risk factors or differences in genetic susceptibility across ancestry groups. "Trans-ancestry genetic correlation" quantifies the similarity in genetic predisposition to a trait or disease between different populations. We aimed to calculate the trans-ancestry genetic correlation of refractive error across a diverse range of ancestry groups (European, South Asian, East Asian and African) using recently developed approaches. MethodsTwo methods were applied: (1) trans-ancestry genetic correlation with unbalanced data resources (TAGC-UDR) and (2) trans-ancestry bivariate genomic-relatedness-based restricted maximum-likelihood (TAB-GREML). TAGC-UDR analyses were carried out for UK Biobank participants of European (n=107,668; n=3,500), East Asian (n=972), South Asian (n=4,303) and African (n=3,877) ancestry. TAB-GREML analyses were carried out for participants of European (n=10,000), South Asian (n=4,303) and African (n=3,877) ancestry. ResultsTAGC-UDR analyses suggested the trans-ancestry genetic correlation of refractive error was in the range 0.7-1.0 for the European vs. African, European vs. East Asian and European vs. South Asian ancestry pairs. The TAB-GREML estimates were consistent with the TAGC-UDR findings. Precision of the estimates was limited, reflecting the modest sample sizes of the non-European samples. ConclusionThe findings support existing evidence that genetic susceptibility to refractive error is largely shared between Europeans and East Asians, and further suggest that genetic susceptibility to refractive error is largely shared across Europeans, Africans and South Asians. The results imply that differences in geographical variation in myopia prevalence are mostly driven by lifestyle factors.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Statin use in relation to intraocular pressure, glaucoma, and ocular coherence tomography parameters in the UK Biobank 94%
- North Carolina macular dystrophy: phenotypic variability and computational analysis of disease-implicated non-coding variants 93%
- Rare and Common Genetic Variants, Smoking and Higher Body Mass Index Are Associated with Earlier Age of Progression to Geographic Atrophy and Neovascular Advanced Stages of Macular Degeneration in a Prospective Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- EyeG2P: an automated variant filtering approach improves efficiency of diagnostic genomic testing for inherited ophthalmic disorders 93%
- Advancing Genotype-Phenotype Analysis through 3D Facial Morphometry: Insights from Cri-du-Chat Syndrome 90%
- Heritable genetic variants in key cancer genes link cancer risk with anthropometric traits 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of More Than 3500 Inherited Retinal Disease Patients from the United Kingdom 92%
- Artificial intelligence to facilitate clinical trial recruitment in age-related macular degeneration 91%
- The Refractive Error and Vision Impairment Estimation With Spectacle data (REVIEWS) study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.