Back

Revisiting the Trans-Ancestry Genetic Correlation of Refractive Error

Clark, R.; He, X.; Nguyen, T.-N.; Bui, T. H.; Noor, H.; Williams, C.; Terry, L.; Guggenheim, J. A.

2025-05-08 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.05.08.25327073 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe prevalence of myopia varies significantly across the globe. This may be a consequence of differences in exposure to lifestyle risk factors or differences in genetic susceptibility across ancestry groups. "Trans-ancestry genetic correlation" quantifies the similarity in genetic predisposition to a trait or disease between different populations. We aimed to calculate the trans-ancestry genetic correlation of refractive error across a diverse range of ancestry groups (European, South Asian, East Asian and African) using recently developed approaches. MethodsTwo methods were applied: (1) trans-ancestry genetic correlation with unbalanced data resources (TAGC-UDR) and (2) trans-ancestry bivariate genomic-relatedness-based restricted maximum-likelihood (TAB-GREML). TAGC-UDR analyses were carried out for UK Biobank participants of European (n=107,668; n=3,500), East Asian (n=972), South Asian (n=4,303) and African (n=3,877) ancestry. TAB-GREML analyses were carried out for participants of European (n=10,000), South Asian (n=4,303) and African (n=3,877) ancestry. ResultsTAGC-UDR analyses suggested the trans-ancestry genetic correlation of refractive error was in the range 0.7-1.0 for the European vs. African, European vs. East Asian and European vs. South Asian ancestry pairs. The TAB-GREML estimates were consistent with the TAGC-UDR findings. Precision of the estimates was limited, reflecting the modest sample sizes of the non-European samples. ConclusionThe findings support existing evidence that genetic susceptibility to refractive error is largely shared between Europeans and East Asians, and further suggest that genetic susceptibility to refractive error is largely shared across Europeans, Africans and South Asians. The results imply that differences in geographical variation in myopia prevalence are mostly driven by lifestyle factors.

Published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.