Back

Risk Factors for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Thai Adults with Hypertension

Limpijankit, V. -; Sasiprapha, T.; Teza, H.; Pattanateepapon, A.; Siriyotha, MSc, S. -; Boonmanunt, S.; Attia, J.; Thakkinstian, A.

2025-05-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.05.07.25327197 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLimited data exist on new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) risk factors in Asian populations with hypertension (HTN). This study identified predictors of NOAF in Thai adults with HTN. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults ([&ge;]18 years) newly diagnosed with HTN at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok (2010-2023). Patients with prior atrial fibrillation or predisposing conditions (e.g., valvular heart disease, hyperthyroidism) were excluded. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and medication use were analyzed as time-varying covariates using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsOf 293,798 HTN patients, 168,441 met inclusion criteria. Over a median 3.7-year follow-up (range: 2.2-8.0), 5,028 developed NOAF (incidence: 5.7 per 1,000 person-years). An age-body mass index (BMI) interaction was observed. In patients <60 years, low BMI increased NOAF risk [hazard ratio (HR) 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.6], while overweight [HR 1.1; 0.8-1.4] and obesity [HR 0.8; 0.6-1.1] showed no significant effect. In patients [&ge;]60 years, NOAF risk rose 2- to 4-fold across BMI categories. Male sex and comorbidities (vascular disease, stroke, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hyperuricemia) increased risk by 1.2-1.8-fold. Statin use reduced risk [HR 0.8; 0.7-0.9]; sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists showed a non-significant protective trend [HR 0.8; 0.7-1.1]. ConclusionsOlder age, male sex, abnormal BMI, and the presence of comorbidities are significant risk factors for NOAF in Thai patients with HTN. In contrast, statin use may offer a protective effect.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.