The effect of enzyme and protein containing toothpaste on gingival condition: a randomised controlled study
Xiao, H.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; Matheson, J. R.; Lin, S.; Sun, J. N.; Delfanti, C.; Tian, J.; Gupta, A. K.; Huang, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccumulation of dental plaque can lead to gum problems. A fluoride toothpaste containing naturally occurring enzymes and proteins has been shown to improve gingival health and reduce supragingival plaque in European populations. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the ability of this toothpaste to improve gingival condition and reduce supragingival plaque in an alternative study population. MethodsThis was a double-blind (participant, examiner, investigator, statistician), randomised, parallel group, efficacy study conducted at a Chinese university dental hospital. Participants (age 18-70) with a mean gingival index (GI) [≥] 1.0 and mean modified Quigley and Hein plaque index (MQHPI) [≥] 1.5 were randomised using sex stratification to twice-daily brushing with either test toothpaste (n=127) or control fluoride toothpaste (n=124) for 26 weeks. Assessments of GI (primary outcome) and MQHPI were conducted at baseline and after 4, 13 and 26 weeks of product use. Results were analysed using ANCOVA model for between product comparison (= 0.05). ResultsOne hundred and six participants using test toothpaste and 92 using control toothpaste completed the study. The test toothpaste was more effective than control toothpaste in improving gingival condition after 4, 13 and 26 weeks of product use, with estimate product differences in GI of -0.18 at week 4 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.12), -0.16 at week 13 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.11) and -0.53 at week 26 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.46). The test toothpaste was also significantly more effective than control toothpaste in reducing supragingival plaque after 4, 13 and 26 weeks of product use, with estimated product differences of -0.29 at week 4 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.21), -0.35 at week 13 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.25) and -0.96 at week 26 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.85). ConclusionThe study demonstrated that a toothpaste containing naturally occurring enzymes and proteins significantly improved gingival health and reduced supragingival plaque compared to a control toothpaste, after 4, 13, and 26 weeks of use.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Burnout: A Predictor Of Oral Health Impact Profile Among Nigerian Early Career Doctors 95%
- Oral Microbiota Interactions with Titanium Implants: A pilot in-vivo and in-vitro study on the impact of Peri-implantitis 94%
- Highly Efficient Antibiofilm and Antifungal Activity of Green Propolis against Candida species in dentistry material 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Which surface treatment improves the long-term repair bond strength of aged methacrylate-based composite resin restorations? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 95%
- Evaluation of RNA extraction free method for detection of SARS-COV-2 in salivary samples for mass screening for COVID-19 90%
- EGCG-modified bone graft to modulate the recruitment of M1 macrophage and alleviate the forming of fibrous capsule 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Periodontal inflammation mediates the link between homocysteine and high blood pressure 93%
- You-Gui-Wan ameliorates house dust mite-induced allergic asthma via modulating amino acid metabolic disorder and gut dysbiosis 88%
- Evaluating the potential of marine invertebrate and insect protein hydrolysates to reduce fetal bovine serum in cell culture media for cultivated fish production 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Silicone toothbrushes: A scoping review of an underutilized tool in global oral health 95%
- Egg Consumption and Bone Mass Density among the Elderly: A Scoping Review 90%
- Acceptability and associated factors of indoor residual spraying for Malaria control by households in Luangwa district of Zambia: A multilevel analysis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.