Back

Revisiting atypical language lateralization in dyslexia

Verhelst, H.; Karlsson, E. M.; Gerrits, R.; Vingerhoets, G.

2025-05-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.06.652381 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hemispheric lateralization has been central to developmental dyslexia research for over a century, yet its role in the etiology of reading and language deficits remains elusive. While altered asymmetries have long been implicated, evidence is inconsistent, with limited consideration given to individual variability in lateralization patterns. This study investigated hemispheric lateralization in 35 adults with dyslexia and 35 matched controls using functional MRI across three language tasks: word generation, rhyming decision, and lexical decision. Laterality indices (LIs) were calculated to comprehensively assess the strength, direction, and consistency of activation across global and regional task-specific brain areas. Significant group differences were not found in the absolute strength of lateralization for global measures or any regional measures, except in the fusiform gyrus, where people with dyslexia showed lower asymmetry. Directional asymmetry was similar across the two groups, except in the fusiform gyrus during the reading task, where dyslexic individuals showed a higher prevalence of right-hemisphere lateralization compared to controls. Interestingly, we found that dyslexic participants demonstrated greater inconsistency in regional lateralization during reading and rhyming tasks. Among individuals with dyslexia, those with inconsistent lateralization in the reading task had weaker fusiform lateralization, although fusiform LI strength itself did not predict reading outcomes. Our findings suggest that dyslexia is characterized by inconsistent, rather than universally weaker, lateralization patterns. Inconsistencies in task-related and regional lateralization may disrupt the efficiency of language networks, contributing to observed reading deficits. By highlighting the role of regional and task-specific inconsistencies, this study provides new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying dyslexia and underscores the importance of considering individual variability in hemispheric lateralization when investigating language disorders.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.2%
4
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
6
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
14
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
16
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
22
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
24
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
27
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%