Back

LAMPrey: a standardised method for analysing quantitative LAMP (qLAMP) and qPCR reactions using the inflection cycle threshold iCt

Bates, A.; Li, J.; Rivero, F.; Wollenberg Valero, K. C.

2025-05-07 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.05.06.651076 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (qLAMP) is a relatively new method that has gained popularity in recent years, particularly in disease identification, including during the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Unlike conventional quantitative PCR (qPCR), qLAMP features a linear amplification phase before the exponential phase. Determining cycle threshold (Ct) values through automatic thresholding may therefore produce inaccurate results, and the nature of these thresholds complicates comparability between studies and softwares. We introduce a new method for transforming sigmoidal amplification curves into inflection threshold curve (iCt) to address issues with auto thresholds and analysis of qLAMP. This method is implemented as a collection of R functions named LAMPrey, suitable for analysis of both qPCR and qLAMP reactions performed in the two most commonly used real-time thermocyclers. We simulate qLAMP amplification differences, demonstrate that iCt and Ct methods perform equivalently for conventional qPCR with an Illumina library quantitation kit, and show that iCt values outperform Ct values for quantifying qLAMP reactions in zebrafish embryos. All scripts developed for this paper are available at https://github.com/dodged13/LAMPrey Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=96 SRC="FIGDIR/small/651076v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (37K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d5bbforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@102713eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@158bcbcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cf11b3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Published in Biology Methods and Protocols (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.