Reliability of biomechanical mensuration methods of the sagittal cervical spine on radiography used in clinical practice: A systematic review of literature
Lightstone, D. F.; Betz, J. W.; Haas, J. W.; Ferrantelli, J. R.; Oakley, P. A.; Moustafa, I. M.; Harrison, D. E.
Show abstract
Biomedical literature assessing reliability of mensuration of sagittal cervical spine alignment on radiographs is limited. This review aims to systematically identify and assess reliability studies on biomechanical assessments of the sagittal cervical spine used in clinical practice. The study design was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023402990). Funding was from CBP, Non-Profit (Eagle, ID, USA). Inclusion criteria involved studies in English with: human subjects, radiography of the sagittal cervical spine, and reliability analysis on biomechanical mensuration of sagittal cervical spine. Exclusion criteria involved studies with: geometric modeling, animals, cadavers, phantom mannequins, and non-radiographic studies. Pubmed, CINAHL, AltHealth Watch, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through January 24, 2023. The quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL) assessed bias risk. Results are presented following the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews guidelines. Scrutiny of inclusion criteria yielded 51 articles. Results are limited due to heterogeneity of the various mensuration methods and statistical analyses. The preponderance of evidence found good to excellent reliability. The results of this systematic review show that sagittal radiographic mensuration of cervical spine biomechanics and alignment is a reliable method for the diagnosis and management of spine conditions in clinical settings.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the relationship between internal spinal alignment and back shape in patients with scoliosis using PCdare: a comparative, reliability and validation study 97%
- Intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the handheld dynamometer in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis 94%
- Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 94%
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 94%
- Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial 92%
- Beneficial influence of single-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of lumbar brucella spondylitis combined with spondylolisthesis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Operative Time and Blood Loss with the FFX(R) Device Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation During Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study 92%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 91%
- Impact of mHealth interventions on antenatal and postnatal care utilization in low and middle-income countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does Time to Theatre Affect The Ability to Achieve Fracture Reduction in Tibial Plateau Fractures? 92%
- A Call For Better Methodological Quality Of Reviews On Using Artificial Intelligence For COVID-19 Detection In Medical Imaging – An Umbrella Systematic Review 92%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.