Back

Success factors for inter- and transdisciplinary research. Lessons from a decade of studies on invasive aquatic species.

Adrian-Kalchhauser, I.; Bussmann-Charran, K.; N'Guyen, A.; Hirsch, P. E.; Wiegleb, j.; Bergmann, L.; Burkhardt-Holm, P.

2025-05-09 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2025.05.05.652198 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ecological research for environmental management occupies a unique and demanding space at the interface of societal needs and academic research. Projects in this space must reconcile stakeholder involvement and real-world applicability with academic requirements such as disciplinary excellence and career advancement. Here, we present a post-hoc account of a 12-year inter- and transdisciplinary research initiative on the management of invasive gobies in central Europe. Based on a synthesis of inputs, outputs, and outcomes, we distill facilitating conditions that increased the likelihood of the project reaching its goals across political, administrative, societal, institutional, team, and individual levels. Rather than "success factors" in a deterministic sense, these are conditions and practices that created a favorable environment for both academic and applied outcomes. The interaction of these domains created windows of opportunity that could be seized for both scientific progress and societal impact. By reflecting from the perspective of natural scientists directly engaged in such a project, we aim to complement existing social science frameworks with an insider view of the lived realities of inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration. Our retrospective can inform policy makers, funders, and institutions seeking to create enabling environments for interface research, and may support fellow natural scientists in proactively preparing the ground for their own initiatives.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.4%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
5
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.5%
7
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
17
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
21
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
24
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
25
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%