Back

Comparison of the Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Glucose (CHG) Index, Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), and Triglyceride-Glucose (TyG) Index in Predicting the Risk of New-Onset Hypertension Among Prehypertensive Individuals: A Cohort Study

Wang, M.-m.; Du, Z.; Teng, T.; Xu, J.; Dong, Z.; Jiao, Q.; Zhang, N.; Yu, H.

2025-05-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.05.05.25327038 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly identification of individuals at high risk for hypertension development is crucial for implementing timely preventive strategies. Metabolic indices such as the cholesterol-glucose (CHG) index, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), and triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index have emerged as potential biomarkers for metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. However, their comparative predictive value for new-onset hypertension in prehypertensive individuals remains unclear. MethodsThis prospective cohort study utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), including 2,859 adults with prehypertension followed from 2011 to 2015. Participants were stratified based on progression to incident hypertension. Baseline characteristics and metabolic indices were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression models, restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the associations between CHG, AIP, and TyG indices and the risk of developing hypertension. ResultsDuring the 4-year follow-up, 31.34% (896/2,859) of participants developed new-onset hypertension. All three metabolic indices were independently associated with an increased risk of hypertension after multivariable adjustment. The CHG index demonstrated the strongest association (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-2.66, P < 0.001), followed by the TyG index (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.07-1.60, P = 0.010). RCS analysis revealed a significant nonlinear relationship between the CHG index and hypertension risk (P for nonlinear = 0.042), whereas AIP and TyG showed linear trends. ROC analysis indicated that the CHG index had the highest discriminatory ability for predicting hypertension (fully adjusted area under the curve [AUC] = 0.7010), outperforming both AIP (AUC = 0.6997) and TyG (AUC = 0.6980). Subgroup analyses showed that the association between the CHG index and incident hypertension was significantly stronger among individuals with lower educational attainment (illiterate), those aged 60-70 or [&ge;]70 years, and widowed individuals (P for interaction < 0.05). ConclusionAmong prehypertensive individuals, higher baseline levels of CHG, AIP, and TyG indices are significantly associated with an increased risk of developing hypertension. The CHG index demonstrates superior predictive performance and may serve as a valuable tool for early risk stratification and targeted intervention in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.5%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
7
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
9
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
13
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
16
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
19
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%