Back

Does a History of Stroke Affect Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed?

Surendranath, A. k.; gupta, a. k.; Singhal, S. k.

2025-05-06 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.05.05.25327001 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeNonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (gastrointestinal) is potentially life-threatening. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding with a prior history of ischemic stroke. MethodsThe 2021 National Inpatient Sample database was employed to identify 259025 patients diagnosed with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. 1485 patients exhibited a prior diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Data analysis was conducted using Stata version 18 to determine the primary outcome of mortality and secondary outcomes of length of hospitalization, cost, and post-hospitalization care needs. Results259025 patients exhibited admissions due to non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleed, and 1485 (0.57%) patients exhibited prior diagnoses of ischemic stroke. Patients with a history of ischemic stroke had a mean age was 72.35 years with higher comorbidities. Patients with a prior history of ischemic stroke had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 7.51,p<0.01). Length of hospitalization was longer by an mean of 5.68 days (p<0.01), and a higher need for discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR 3.30, p<0.01). Race, median annual income, and geographical distribution were statistically noncontributory to the outcomes. ConclusionPatients with a history of ischemic stroke who present with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding tend to be older and have a higher comorbidity index. Prior history of stroke is an independent factor that contributes to the increased mortality in patients presenting with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. They experience increased mortality rates, prolonged hospitalizations, higher costs during hospitalization, and a greater likelihood of being discharged to a nursing facility.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
6
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
8
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
9
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%