Back

Does a History of Stroke Affect Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed?

Surendranath, A. k.; gupta, a. k.; Singhal, S. k.

2025-05-06 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.05.05.25327001 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeNonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (gastrointestinal) is potentially life-threatening. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding with a prior history of ischemic stroke. MethodsThe 2021 National Inpatient Sample database was employed to identify 259025 patients diagnosed with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. 1485 patients exhibited a prior diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Data analysis was conducted using Stata version 18 to determine the primary outcome of mortality and secondary outcomes of length of hospitalization, cost, and post-hospitalization care needs. Results259025 patients exhibited admissions due to non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleed, and 1485 (0.57%) patients exhibited prior diagnoses of ischemic stroke. Patients with a history of ischemic stroke had a mean age was 72.35 years with higher comorbidities. Patients with a prior history of ischemic stroke had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 7.51,p<0.01). Length of hospitalization was longer by an mean of 5.68 days (p<0.01), and a higher need for discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR 3.30, p<0.01). Race, median annual income, and geographical distribution were statistically noncontributory to the outcomes. ConclusionPatients with a history of ischemic stroke who present with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding tend to be older and have a higher comorbidity index. Prior history of stroke is an independent factor that contributes to the increased mortality in patients presenting with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. They experience increased mortality rates, prolonged hospitalizations, higher costs during hospitalization, and a greater likelihood of being discharged to a nursing facility.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.