Back

Differential PARP inhibitor responses in BRCA1-deficient and resistant cells in competitive co-culture

Soetomo, S. A.; Sharp, M. F.; Crismani, W.

2025-05-02 genetics
10.1101/2025.05.02.651448 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Synthetic lethality describes a genetic relationship where the loss of two genes results in cell death, but the loss of one of those genes does not. Drugs used for precision oncology can exploit synthetic lethal relationships; the best described are PARP inhibitors which preferentially kill BRCA1-deficient tumours preferentially over BRCA1-proficient cells. New synthetic lethal targets are often discovered using genetic screens, such as CRISPR knockout screens. Here, we present a competitive co-culture assay that can be used to analyse drugs or gene knockouts with synthetic lethal effects. We generated new BRCA1 isogenic cell line pairs from both a triple-negative breast cancer cell line (SUM149) and adapted pre-existing non-cancerous BRCA1 isogenic pair (RPE). Each cell line of the isogenic pair was transformed with its own fluorescent reporter. The two-coloured cell lines of the isogenic pair were then grown together in the same vessel to create a more competitive environment compared to when grown separately. We used four PARP inhibitors to validate the ability to detect synthetic lethality in BRCA1-deficient cancer cells. The readout of the assay was performed by counting the fluorescently coloured cells after drug treatment using flow cytometry. We observed preferential targeting of BRCA1-deficient cells, by PARPi, at relative concentrations that broadly reflect clinical dosing. Further we reveal subtle differences between PARPi resistant lines compared to BRCA1-proficient cells. Here, we demonstrate the validation and potential use of the competitive assay, which could be extended to validating novel genetic relationships and adapted for live cell imaging.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.4%
2
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.8%
5
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
6
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
12
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Virus Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
18
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
20
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
The CRISPR Journal
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
26
DNA Repair
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%