Antibody response to Aedes aegypti D7L1+2 salivary proteins as marker of aggregate vector exposure and correlate of dengue virus susceptibility
Bahr, L.; Hamins-Puertolas, M.; Buddhari, D.; Petzlova, I.; Oliveira, F.; Thomas, S. J.; Thangamani, S.; Waickman, A.; Anderson, K.
Show abstract
Aedes aegypti mosquitoes transmit several arboviruses of public health importance. Among these is dengue virus (DENV), a flavivirus whose global infection rates continue to rise each year. With limited options available for preventing or treating DENV infections, mosquito control remains the most widely implemented strategy to combat DENV transmission. Due to the global distribution of DENV, which infects an estimated 400 million people per year, vector suppression practices vary drastically by country and/or region and even small differences in microenvironment can significantly impact vector abundance. There remains a significant need to better understand vector exposure rates at an individual level to disentangle vector exposure and arboviral infection rates. To this end, we have optimized a serologic assay to assess the abundance of antibodies directed against the mosquito salivary proteins AeD7L1+2 as a surrogate metric of vector exposure. Utilizing this assay, we found that anti-D7L1+2 IgG levels were unable to identify low levels of Aedes exposure in individuals with limited prior Aedes exposure, indicating they are unreliable markers of an individuals recent exposure to low levels of these vectors. However, antibody levels against D7L1+2 were robust in plasma samples from individuals living in Aedes endemic regions. These antibody levels reflected seasonal changes in Aedes abundance and exposure, indicating their potential for use as an aggregate marker of vector exposure. Additionally, we found that there were slight negative associations with anti-D7L1+2 IgG levels and age in our cohort. Interestingly, we also found that lower titers of anti-AeD7L1+2 IgG correlated with higher infection burden in households. This finding has implications for the potential interaction between AeD7 proteins and DENV during infection events that will require further study.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mosquito exposure and malaria morbidity; a micro-level analysis of household mosquito populations and malaria in a population-based longitudinal cohort in western Kenya 93%
- Results of a nationally representative seroprevalence survey of chikungunya virus in Bangladesh 93%
- Reduced long-lasting insecticidal net efficacy and pyrethroid insecticide resistance are associated with over-expression of CYP6P4, CYP6P3 and CYP6Z1 in populations of Anopheles coluzzii from South-East Cote d Ivoire 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Host-specific effects of a generalist parasite of mosquitoes 94%
- Insecticide resistance outpaces behavioural adaptation, as a response to Long-Lasting Insecticidal Net distribution, in malaria vectors in Burkina Faso 94%
- Plasmodium infection induces cross-reactive antibodies to carbohydrate epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transmission potential of Floridian Aedes aegypti mosquitoes for dengue virus serotype 4: Implications for estimating local dengue risk 96%
- Microbial composition in larval water enhances Aedes aegypti development but reduces transmissibility of Zika virus 94%
- Clustering and erratic movement patterns of syringe-injected versus mosquito-inoculated malaria sporozoites underlie decreased infectivity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing Wolbachia-based disease interventions for an extreme environment 94%
- Novel phenotype of Wolbachia strain wPip in Aedes aegypti challenges assumptions on mechanisms of Wolbachia-mediated dengue virusinhibition . 93%
- A decade of stability for wMel Wolbachia in natural Aedes aegypti populations 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.