Back

Fetal Health Classification Based on CTG

Madiraju, R.; Upadhyay, U.; C, M.

2025-05-07 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.05.01.651406 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This research paper explores the application of advanced machine learning techniques for fetal health detection using cardiotocography (CTG). Cardiotocography is a pivotal tool in monitoring fetal and maternal health during pregnancy, providing crucial insights into fetal heart rate patterns and uterine contractions. In this work, various predictive models, including logistic regression, nearest neighbors, and gradient boosting classifiers, to analyze CTG data were implemented. The findings indicate that these models can effectively classify fetal health status, with gradient boosting demonstrating the highest predictive accuracy. This work highlights the potential of integrating machine learning methodologies into clinical practice to enhance fetal monitoring, ultimately improving maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Physiological Measurement
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.9%
7
PLOS Digital Health
● 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
IEEE Access
● 35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
● 40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
13
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Bioengineering
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
18
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
19
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.