Familial and Parental Relationships Can Ease Anxiety Among Academics in the United States
Andy, A.; Tonge, N.; Michaels, P.-E.; Holz, M.
Show abstract
Anxiety among academic faculty remains a critical yet understudied public health concern because of comorbidity with depression and other mental health disorders. Here, we present a large study examining faculty anxiety, analyzing data from 2,106 professors across 62 U.S. higher education institutions using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) assessment. This comprehensive dataset revealed previously unknown patterns in how familial relationships and academic lineage influence faculty anxiety. The analysis in this work focused on faculty members who are not in a health profession, The exclusion of health profession faculty members in this study is important because compared to non-health profession faculty members, they experience a distinct set of mental health challenges which are exacerbated by clinical practice. Our analysis uncovered a clear relationship between academic rank and anxiety levels, with tenure-track assistant professors showing the highest anxiety scores (predicted GAD-7 = 7.9) compared to full professors. Although academic discipline explains only 0.32% of anxiety variance, we identify institutional factors and family support as major moderators of faculty mental health. We find that close family relationships significantly moderated anxiety across institution types, with particularly strong protective effects at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) / Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs), b = -4.24, p = .015 and public institutions, b = -1.11, p = .027. These findings address a crucial gap in understanding faculty mental health and suggest that institutions should implement targeted interventions focusing on reinforcing social support systems, particularly for early-career academics.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Undergraduate students with and without mental health concerns have different perceptions of disclosing mental health challenges to instructors 95%
- Factors and mediators impacting the number of undergraduate research mentees at a research-intensive Hispanic-serving institution 95%
- Environmental influences and individual characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and Predictors of Depression among Training Physicians in China: A Comparison to the United States 91%
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 90%
- Loneliness and diurnal cortisol levels during COVID-19 lockdown: the roles of living situation, relationship status and relationship quality 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health in higher-education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study 92%
- Depression and loneliness during COVID-19 restrictions in the United States, and their associations with frequency of social and sexual connections 90%
- The association between experience of COVID-19-related discrimination and psychological distress among healthcare workers for six national medical research centers in Japan 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual mindfulness interventions to promote well-being in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review 91%
- Frequency of Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation Among University Students Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan 93%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 91%
- Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.