Back

A multi-center study to discern the diurnal variation of wearable device-based heart rate variability (HRV) in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study

Skarke, C.; Yang, P.; Sha, D.; Lahens, N.; Isakova, T.; Unruh, M.; tDeo, R.; Carmona-Powell, E.; Holmes, J.; Ficarra, E.; Chen, J.; He, J.; Choles, H.; O Shah, V.; Hsu, C.-y.; Anderson, A.; Lash, J.; Rahman, M.

2025-05-05 nephrology
10.1101/2025.04.30.25326177 medRxiv
Show abstract

Little is known about the prognostic value of out-of-clinic biometric monitoring of cardiovascular function in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Using real-world sampling strategies, a mean ({+/-}SD) of 50.3{+/-}9.3 hours of ECG recordings from wearable BioPatch ECG devices was collected in a cohort consisting of 458 participants from seven Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) centers. The presence of diabetes was associated with a 7.4 ms lower Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN) compared to non-diabetic participants (p=0.001). Multivariable linear regression revealed that participants without proteinuria (uPCR<0.2) had a 5.15 ms higher SDNN compared to participants with proteinuria (uPCR[&ge;]0.2, p=0.027). Cosinor modeling suggested differences in SDNN acrophase quartiles for diabetes (p=0.02), history of cardiovascular disease (p=0.003), eGFR (p=0.04), systolic blood pressure (p=0.04), and beta blocker use (p=0.0002). In the spline analysis, the SDNN curve differed between participants with and without cardiovascular disease (p=0.0005). This study assembled the largest dataset to date of SDNN as an index for heart rate variability from wearable digital health technology in the CRIC. The study demonstrates that several clinical and demographic factors are associated with SDNN in participants with CKD. This sets the stage to determine the predictiveness of time-specific HRV metrics for future clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.0%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.3%
4
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
BMC Nephrology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
8
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
15
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
20
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Circulation Research
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Physiological Genomics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%