Back

Research on Public Risk Perception and Panic Psychology in the Post-Emergency Phase of Major Public Health Crises

Shi, G.; Men, X.; Li, J.; Huang, C.; Ma, l.; Xia, C.

2025-05-02 public and global health
10.1101/2025.04.29.25325326 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study conducted a questionnaire survey among 1,605 citizens across 32 provinces in China to examine public risk perception and panic psychology regarding COVID-19 pandemic information. A predictive model of risk cognition and psychological behaviors was established to analyze public risk perception characteristics and behavioral responses during the late stages of the pandemic. Findings revealed that government preventive measures had the strongest impact on public risk perception, significantly surpassing the effects of infection-related information, recovery-related data, and personally relevant information. Compared to the 2020 risk perception map, dimensions such as "cure rates" and "post-recovery contagiousness" shifted from unfamiliar and uncontrollable to familiar and controllable, indicating substantial improvements in public risk cognition. While public risk awareness and fear levels decreased significantly compared to the initial pandemic phase, perceived control over "post-recovery health impacts" remained insufficient. Empirical analysis demonstrated that both positive and negative pandemic information could elevate public risk perception, which subsequently influenced psychological behaviors through the mediating role of risk cognition. Furthermore, the moderating effect of psychological tension underwent significant changes as the pandemic evolved, highlighting the dynamic adaptability of public socio-psychological and behavioral patterns during major public health crises. This study provides empirical evidence and scientific insights for risk communication strategies in the post-pandemic era.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.0%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
12
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
14
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
23
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%