Research on Public Risk Perception and Panic Psychology in the Post-Emergency Phase of Major Public Health Crises
Shi, G.; Men, X.; Li, J.; Huang, C.; Ma, l.; Xia, C.
Show abstract
This study conducted a questionnaire survey among 1,605 citizens across 32 provinces in China to examine public risk perception and panic psychology regarding COVID-19 pandemic information. A predictive model of risk cognition and psychological behaviors was established to analyze public risk perception characteristics and behavioral responses during the late stages of the pandemic. Findings revealed that government preventive measures had the strongest impact on public risk perception, significantly surpassing the effects of infection-related information, recovery-related data, and personally relevant information. Compared to the 2020 risk perception map, dimensions such as "cure rates" and "post-recovery contagiousness" shifted from unfamiliar and uncontrollable to familiar and controllable, indicating substantial improvements in public risk cognition. While public risk awareness and fear levels decreased significantly compared to the initial pandemic phase, perceived control over "post-recovery health impacts" remained insufficient. Empirical analysis demonstrated that both positive and negative pandemic information could elevate public risk perception, which subsequently influenced psychological behaviors through the mediating role of risk cognition. Furthermore, the moderating effect of psychological tension underwent significant changes as the pandemic evolved, highlighting the dynamic adaptability of public socio-psychological and behavioral patterns during major public health crises. This study provides empirical evidence and scientific insights for risk communication strategies in the post-pandemic era.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 94%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychological impact of 'mild lockdown' in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide survey under a declared state of emergency 95%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 94%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of University Students’ Mental Health from the Perspective of Occupational Harmony 95%
- Who is (Not) Complying with the Social Distancing Directive and Why? Testing a General Framework of Compliance with Multiple Measures of Social Distancing 95%
- The relationship between new PCR positive cases and going out in public during the COVID-19 epidemic in Japan 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the community risk perception toward COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea: evidence from Google and NAVER relative search volume 94%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 93%
- The Relationship Between COVID-19 Infection and Risk Perception, Knowledge, Attitude As Well As Four Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) During the Late Period Of The COVID-19 Epidemic In China -- An Online Cross-sectional Survey of 8158 Adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceived vulnerability to COVID-19 infection from event attendance: Results from Louisiana, USA, two weeks preceding the national emergency declaration 93%
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 93%
- Gender Differences in Health Protective Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: An Empirical Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.