Evaluating Patient Experience in a Rural-Serving Nephrology Clinic: Psychometric assessment of the consideRATE questions and assessment of care experience
Nano, J. P.; Zhu, A.; Sachdeva, R.; O'Hare, A. M.; Milliman, A.; Block, C. A.; Elwyn, G.; Leyenaar, J. K.; Gerraughty, L.; MacMartin, M. A.; Fuller, N. M.; Bernstein, S. L.; Junkins, V. L.; Saunders, C. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe illness experiences of people with kidney disease are not systematically ascertained as part of clinical care. We conducted the first real-world psychometric evaluation of the consideRATE questions among patients with kidney disease and assessed healthcare experiences in a rural hospital setting. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey with a sample of patients with kidney disease and their care partners. Our survey consisted of demographic questions, consideRATE (8-items) to measure healthcare experience, and CANHELP-Lite (21-items) as a reference for consideRATE psychometric assessment. We scored consideRATE as continuous (range: 1-4) and top-box (score=4). We conducted internal reliability (Cronbachs alpha) and validity (convergent and discriminant using Pearsons correlation) tests. We compared mean consideRATE scores between paired subgroups using t-tests. We examined the relationship between rurality and healthcare experience using a multivariable linear regression model and rural-urban commuting area codes. ResultsWe recruited 163 participants, including 52 who lived in rural areas. The mean consideRATE score was 3.65 (SD=0.42), and the top-box score was 35% (n=59). Internal consistency for consideRATE was 0.86. We demonstrated convergent validity (continuous: r=0.5, p<0.001 and top-box: r=0.3, p<0.001) and discriminant validity (continuous: r=0.1, p>0.05 and top-box: r=0.1, p>0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in overall consideRATE scores by rurality status, state of residence, travel time, and gender. After adjustment for demographics, lower continuous mean consideRATE scores were significantly associated with longer travel time to the clinic (p<0.01), religious affiliation (p<0.05), and age over 55 years (p<0.01). We found no significant association between total consideRATE score and rurality. ConclusionWe found validity in the first real-world psychometric assessment of consideRATE among people with kidney disease and found associations between healthcare experience and various demographic variables.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 95%
- Patient Perceptions by Race of Educational Animations About Living Kidney Donation Made for a Diverse Population 95%
- Chronic Kidney Disease in Ecuador: An Epidemiological and Health System Analysis of an Emerging Public Health Crisis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘ That’s why I wanted him to go on dialysis ’ – a qualitative inductive thematic analysis of older patients’ and their family members’ perspectives on kidney failure treatment decision-making 96%
- Health-related hope and reduced distress associated with fluid and dietary restrictions in advanced chronic kidney disease and dialysis: a cohort study 95%
- Ramadan and Kidney disease (RaK) risk assessment tool. Potential Risk Calculator for Evaluating the Risk of Ramadan Fasting In Chronic Kidney Disease patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Directed Interventions Associate with Decreased Hospitalization Rates in Hemodialysis Patients 95%
- Completion of electronic nursing documentation of inpatient admission assessment: insights from Australian metropolitan hospitals 92%
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mediating role of trust in physicians on the association between multidimensional health literacy and medication adherence in hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study 96%
- Preprint server use in kidney disease research: a rapid review 90%
- Out-of-sequence placement of deceased donor kidneys is exacerbating inequities in the United States 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 94%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 92%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.