Back

EBUS Diagnostic Yield for Sarcoidosis in Hilar vs. Mediastinal Lymph Nodes

Mahmood, N.; Wolf, S.; Dash, R.; Wang, X.; Shofer, S. L.; Giovacchini, C. X.; Dorry, M.; Ali, H. A.; Mahmood, K.; Wahidi, M. M.

2025-04-21 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.04.20.25326129 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPulmonary sarcoidosis is diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirate (EBUS-TBNA) of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and the finding of non-caseating granulomatous inflammation. There are currently no guidelines about which lymph node stations to sample to optimize the diagnostic yield and it is unclear if there is a difference in the yield between hilar and mediastinal lymph node stations. MethodsA retrospective study was performed to assess the difference in the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for non-caseating granulomas between hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. ResultsTwo hundred twenty-five patients with suspicion of sarcoidosis underwent EBUS-TBNA for evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The yield of EBUS-TBNA for non-caseating granulomas was 61.8% vs. 65.5%, P = 0.46, for hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, respectively. The sensitivity for sarcoidosis of EBUS-TBNA of hilar vs. mediastinal nodes was 66.9% (95% confidence interval or CI, 58.9%-74.9%) vs. 71.1% (95% CI, 65.3%-76.9%). The specificity for sarcoidosis of EBUS-TBNA of both hilar and mediastinal nodes was 100%. The diagnostic yield for non-caseating granulomas in patients who underwent hilar nodes biopsy only, mediastinal nodes biopsy only, and both hilar and mediastinal nodes biopsy was 71.4%, 67%, and 73.1%, respectively (P=0.63). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA was only associated with age (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98; P <0.01). ConclusionsThe yield of EBUS-TBNA for non-caseating granulomas in patients with suspected sarcoidosis was similar between the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.