Back

iPlayer: an open-source tool for time-windowed video annotation of human physical activity and behaviour

Letts, E.; Masson, D.; Obeid, J.

2025-04-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.04.17.25326032 medRxiv
Show abstract

We present iPlayer, a video annotation tool for direct observation of human activity. In contrast to other tools generally designed for continuous or intermittent annotation, iPlayer is optimized for annotations of specific time windows. The tool is cross-platform (MacOS, Windows, and Linux), open-source, locally-run, and configurable to support different labels and time window sizes. Users can annotate multiple activities per window and the video can be optionally looped over the window, reducing annotation error particularly for small window sizes. We developed and used the tool to annotate toddler activity and position in 1-second windows to be synchronized with raw accelerometer data. We also provide examples of how iPlayer could be used with other annotation frameworks. While the tool was optimized for annotations of human activity, we believe it may be of use to any researchers looking to precisely annotate segments of video recordings.

Published in Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
◐ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Behavior Research Methods
○ 30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS Digital Health
● 106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
○ 87 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
7
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.8%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
◐ 87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
○ 122 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
12
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
◐ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
JMIR Formative Research
◐ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
16
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Digital Health
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
20
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Wellcome Open Research
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
Current Protocols
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
24
JAMIA Open
◐ 42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
BMC Public Health
○ 158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
IEEE Access
● 35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
Imaging Neuroscience
● 282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
Journal of Vision
● 110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.