Differences in the cost of manufacturing pharmaceuticals in India for differently regulated markets: A comparative analysis
Ambhaikar, S.; Shenai, S.; Govindarajan, V.; Gajare, P.; Kulkarni, P. K.; Suryanarayanan, S.; Peterson, C.; Schoukroun-Barnes, L.; Inamdar, M.; Paria, S.; Francese, G.; Lumpkin, M.; Dore, J.; Rusatira, J. C.; Preston, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundEnsuring access to affordable, high-quality pharmaceuticals is essential for global health. However, regulatory requirements vary significantly across markets, influencing manufacturing costs, drug prices, and access to quality medicines. This study examines cost variations in pharmaceutical manufacturing in India for products destined for three distinct regulatory markets: the United States (highly regulated), the World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification (highly regulated), and India (regulatory stringency comparable to many Lower- and Middle-Income Countries). Understanding these cost differences provides valuable insights for regulators, policymakers, and procurers striving to balance affordability, quality, and accessibility. MethodsThe study utilizes a bottom-up costing approach to estimate manufacturing expenses for small-molecule generic drugs produced in India for different regulatory markets. Cost estimates are based on real-world industry data from Sidvim, a pharmaceutical manufacturing consultancy. The analysis distinguishes between capital expenditures (CAPEX) and operational expenditures (OPEX), comparing costs associated with active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and finished dosage form (FDF) production. To isolate cost variations related to regulatory requirements, the study standardizes manufacturing conditions, including production scale, volumes, and facility utilization. ResultsThe findings indicate substantial cost differences based on regulatory market. Manufacturing API and FDF for the Indian market incurs 43% lower CAPEX and 47% lower OPEX compared to the U.S. Key cost drivers include regulatory compliance, facility infrastructure, equipment standards, quality control, and personnel costs. Facilities serving highly regulated markets require stringent quality control, high-grade equipment, and frequent inspections, contributing to elevated costs. The study highlights the need for research on trade-offs between affordability and quality. Enhancing international collaboration and regulatory harmonization may facilitate access to high-quality, affordable medicines globally. ConclusionCost disparities in pharmaceutical manufacturing underscore the challenge of balancing affordability with quality. Further research is needed to assess how these cost variations impact patient access, informing regulatory strategies and procurement policies across diverse market settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing defined daily doses (DDDs) for antimicrobial agents used for pigs, cattle and poultry in Japan and comparing them with European DDD values 93%
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal 93%
- Stability of extemporaneously compounded amiloride nasal spray 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. 92%
- Decentralisation of the compliance of anti-tobacco law in India: The case of higher educational institutions in New Delhi, India 90%
- Administration Of Levodopa In A Parkinson’S Patient Using A Novel Oral And Maxillofacial Route – A First In Human Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidences of poor-quality pharmaceutical products in Nepal 94%
- The impact of National Centralized Drug Procurement policy on the use of policy-related original and generic drugs in public medical institutions in China: A difference-in-difference analysis based on national database 92%
- Purchasing high-cost medical equipment in hospitals: A systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Declines, and Pronounced Regional Disparities, in Meperidine Use in the United States 91%
- Pharmacoepidemiology of Oxycodone in the USA: an observational study of ARCOS, Medicaid, and Medicare drug databases 91%
- Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions of the Type 2 Antidiabetic Drug Class Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i): Can polypharmacology help explain? 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.