Post Induction Hypotension prediction during general anesthesia using Machine Learning Techniques
Subramanian, H.; Visweswaran, S.; Sadhasivam, S.; Mahajan, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIntraoperative hypotension burden not equally distributed during various periods of a general anesthetic. Post-induction hypotension usually has an iatrogenic cause and is related to the combination of drug doses used for induction of anesthesia. Predicting post-induction blood pressures, prior to induction, may inform anesthesiologists on the most judicious selection of anesthetic drugs and dosages. Our objective was to explore patterns of post-induction hypotension, apply machine learning (ML) to predict the mean blood pressure (MBP) immediately after induction, and develop a prototype of a clinical tool that can implement the ML model. Materials and MethodsWe extracted data from preoperative and intraoperative anesthetic episodes over an 8-year period at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The dataset consisted of 93,037 anesthetic episodes, which was partitioned into training, validation, and test sets. Preoperative and pre-induction predictor variables included demographics, comorbidities, laboratory test values, pre-induction MBP, and administrations of induction drugs. The target consisted of 15 minutes of MBP values immediately after induction. ResultsThe best-performing model was extreme-gradient boosted trees (XGB), with an R-squared value of 0.31 and a mean absolute error of 11.96, which is a moderately good performance. The performance of the model decreased over each minute post-induction. ConclusionML modeling to predict post-induction MBP is feasible, and a clinical tool that incorporates ML can potentially aid in preventing hypotension in the operating room.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Preoperative predictions of in-hospital mortality using electronic medical record data 95%
- Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial 94%
- Effect of Machine Learning on Anaesthesiology Clinician Prediction of Postoperative Complications: The Perioperative ORACLE Randomised Clinical Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 95%
- Quantitative assessment of the relationship between behavioral and autonomic dynamics during propofol-induced unconsciousness 94%
- Association between epidural catheter tip malposition and anesthesiologists’ experience after graduation: a cross-sectional study using postoperative CT images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A standardized analytics pipeline for reliable and rapid development and validation of prediction models using observational health data 92%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 91%
- Towards Clinical Prediction with Transparency: An Explainable AI Approach to Survival Modelling in Residential Aged Care 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Predictive Nomogram for In-ICU Deterioration of Stage 1 Pressure Injuries: A Retrospective Study 92%
- Machine Learning-based Clinical Decision Support for Infection Risk Prediction 92%
- Disruption of Normal Saline Supply Chain due to Natural Disaster: an analysis of the impact of normal saline shortage on anesthesia practice in a large hospital system and models towards resiliency 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiorespiratory physiological perturbations after acute smoke-induced lung injury and during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in sheep 89%
- A Systematic Investigation of Detectors for Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio EMG Signals 89%
- Findings of a feasibility study of pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scheduled for major abdominal surgery. 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.