Back

Identification of novel therapeutic inhibitors against E6 and E7 oncogenes of HPV-16 associated with cervical cancer

Younas, S.; Malik, Z. I.; Khan, M. U.; Manzoor, S.; Hammad, H. M.; Rehman, H. M.; Akter, S.

2025-04-18 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.04.13.648624 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHuman Papilloma Virus type 16 (HPV-16) is highly oncogenic with the E6 and E7 oncogenes playing crucial roles in the pathogenesis of HPV-related cervical carcinogenesis. Targeting these oncoproteins with specific inhibitors offers a promising approach for therapeutic intervention. ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify potential inhibitors of the HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins through an in silico approach, providing a foundation for the development of targeted therapies against HPV associated malignancies. MethodologyWe performed virtual screening on a library of 1000 compounds to identify promising candidates. Subsequent molecular docking studies were conducted to assess the binding affinities of the promising candidates. The top-scoring compounds for oncoproteins were then subjected to molecular dynamics simulations to evaluate their stability and interaction profiles. ResultsThe virtual screening identified 14 promising candidates followed by docking studies. Among these Galangin was identified as a promising inhibitor for the E6 oncogene, while Neoechinulin showed potential as an inhibitor of the E7 oncogene. ConclusionOur findings suggest Galangin and Neoechinulin with high potential as therapeutic inhibitors of HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncogenes respectively. These inhibitors could contribute significantly to the development of targeted therapies against HPV associated malignancies. However, further in vitro and in vivo investigations are required to use these phytochemicals as antiviral agents against HPV-16.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.