Construction of patient trajectories to model clinical trial outcomes: Application to Myasthenia Gravis
Garbey, M.; Lesport, Q.; Kaminski, H. J.
Show abstract
Accurate prediction of patient outcomes in clinical trials is crucial for timely assessment of treatment efficacy. This study introduces a novel approach to predict patient response by constructing temporal trajectories from longitudinal clinical data. We aim to extrapolate these trajectories to forecast individual outcomes and identify when new patients align with established response patterns. Utilizing data from the MGTX trial of myasthenia gravis patients, we evaluate the predictability of these trajectories and discuss potential confounding factors. Furthermore, our analysis yields an automatic clustering of patients based on treatment success, revealing potential associations with age and smoking status.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts 95%
- A Hessian-based decomposition characterizes how performance in complex motor skills depends on individual strategy and variability 94%
- Identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients using machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data using Human-understandable Machine Learning 93%
- Fitting drift-diffusion decision models to trial-by-trial data 91%
- An Explainable Multi-Modal Neural Network Architecture for Predicting Epilepsy Comorbidities Based on Administrative Claims Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves prediction of heart failure deaths 93%
- Causal Analysis for Multivariate Integrated Clinical and Environmental Exposures Data 92%
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.