Back

Assessing attitude, self-efficacy, and perceived risk toward seasonal influenza vaccination among primary care physicians in Qatar: A cross-sectional study

Aziz, K.; Ismail, M. s.; Bibars, M.; Selim, N.; Mohamed, A.; Alnuaimi, A. S.; AlSaadi, M. M.

2025-04-21 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.04.11.25325654 medRxiv
Show abstract

1.This cross-sectional study examined influenza-related attitude, self-efficacy and perceived risk among 190 primary health care physicians. Participants were predominantly male (over 50%), aged [≥]45 years (55.7%), with one-third reporting chronic diseases. Most (96.3%) had prior influenza vaccination, though only 73.3% were vaccinated in the last season. While 87.9% endorsed vaccination for healthcare workers to ensure service continuity, only 37.4% supported mandatory policies. Notably, 46% believed healthcare professionals do not pose influenza transmission risks to patients. Self-efficacy for vaccination was strongly tied to time availability (73.7% agreement) and institutional vaccine provision (78.9%), with social support from colleagues (79.5%) and relatives (68.9%) further influencing adherence. Male physicians (87.5%) and those with [≥]5 prior vaccine doses (88.6%) or recent vaccination (87.3%) reported higher self-efficacy, though chronic disease history showed no significant association. Risk perception disparities emerged: 94.2% acknowledged elevated occupational risk during epidemics, yet only 62.1% perceived personal risk. Similarly, 86.3% viewed influenza as dangerous for patients versus 64.2% for themselves. Higher perceived risk scores correlated with chronic disease history (84.5), prior vaccination (81.1), recent vaccination (82.8), and [≥]5 vaccine doses (85.0). Information sources prioritized official health agencies (Ministry of Public Health: 59.5%; WHO/CDC: 56.3%), while traditional media were least utilized (7.9- 21.1%). These findings highlight gaps between professional risk acknowledgment and personal risk mitigation, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, improve access, and align perceptions with evidence-based practices in healthcare settings.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.