Assessing attitude, self-efficacy, and perceived risk toward seasonal influenza vaccination among primary care physicians in Qatar: A cross-sectional study
Aziz, K.; Ismail, M. s.; Bibars, M.; Selim, N.; Mohamed, A.; Alnuaimi, A. S.; AlSaadi, M. M.
Show abstract
1.This cross-sectional study examined influenza-related attitude, self-efficacy and perceived risk among 190 primary health care physicians. Participants were predominantly male (over 50%), aged [≥]45 years (55.7%), with one-third reporting chronic diseases. Most (96.3%) had prior influenza vaccination, though only 73.3% were vaccinated in the last season. While 87.9% endorsed vaccination for healthcare workers to ensure service continuity, only 37.4% supported mandatory policies. Notably, 46% believed healthcare professionals do not pose influenza transmission risks to patients. Self-efficacy for vaccination was strongly tied to time availability (73.7% agreement) and institutional vaccine provision (78.9%), with social support from colleagues (79.5%) and relatives (68.9%) further influencing adherence. Male physicians (87.5%) and those with [≥]5 prior vaccine doses (88.6%) or recent vaccination (87.3%) reported higher self-efficacy, though chronic disease history showed no significant association. Risk perception disparities emerged: 94.2% acknowledged elevated occupational risk during epidemics, yet only 62.1% perceived personal risk. Similarly, 86.3% viewed influenza as dangerous for patients versus 64.2% for themselves. Higher perceived risk scores correlated with chronic disease history (84.5), prior vaccination (81.1), recent vaccination (82.8), and [≥]5 vaccine doses (85.0). Information sources prioritized official health agencies (Ministry of Public Health: 59.5%; WHO/CDC: 56.3%), while traditional media were least utilized (7.9- 21.1%). These findings highlight gaps between professional risk acknowledgment and personal risk mitigation, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, improve access, and align perceptions with evidence-based practices in healthcare settings.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in Pakistan Among Health Care Workers 98%
- COVID-19 vaccine confidence and hesitancy among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional survey from a MERS-CoV experienced nation 97%
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 97%
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies before and after implementation of anti-COVID-19 vaccination among hospital staff in Bangui, Central African Republic 95%
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ worries and Monkeypox vaccine advocacy during the first month of the WHO Monkeypox alert: Cross-sectional survey in Saudi Arabia 97%
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare staff and students of a tertiary institution in South Africa 96%
- The role of incentives in deciding to receive the available COVID-19 vaccine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 97%
- The effect of Health Literacy on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: The Moderating Role of Stress 96%
- Midwives’ attitudes toward participation of pregnant women in a preventive vaccine hypothetical clinical trial 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.