Back

Brain Signal Variability During Rest as a Neural Mechanism Underlying Cognitive Reserve

Coors, A.; Stern, Y.; Habeck, C.

2025-04-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.09.648011 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundResting-state brain signal variability has been found to vary with age and cognitive function. Neural flexibility has been suggested as a neural mechanism underlying cognitive reserve (CR), a construct that describes better than expected cognition given brain status. Thus, we examined the associations between age, resting-state brain signal variability, cognition, and CR. MethodAnalysis was based on resting-state functional neuroimaging data from 470 participants (aged 20-80 years) from the Reference Ability Neural Networks and the CR studies. Brain signal variability was quantified for each brain region as the log-transformed standard deviation of the time-varying blood-oxygen-dependent (BOLD) signal. We then derived variability patterns related to age, perceptual speed, fluid reasoning, episodic memory, and vocabulary using Scaled Subprofile Modelling principal component analysis. To perform the formal test whether these patterns fulfill the requirements for CR, we examined whether they explained additional variance in cognition beyond brain status, age, sex, and education, or moderated the brain status-cognition relationship. We additionally stratified all regression models by age (cutoff: 60 years) and sex. ResultsBOLD signal variability showed an age-related increase in subcortical/medial brain regions, and an age-related decrease in cortical regions. It also met the CR test for speed (standardized regression coefficient ({beta})=0.251, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.118-0.384, pFDR<0.001), episodic memory ({beta}=0.344, CI: 0.200-0.489, pFDR<0.001), reasoning ({beta}=0.316, CI: 0.197-0.436, pFDR<0.001), and vocabulary ({beta}=0.270, CI: 0.167-0.373, pFDR<0.001). Associations were stronger in women for vocabulary and in young individuals for reasoning. ConclusionsBOLD signal variability plays a role in aging and cognition and underlies CR.

Published in NeuroImage (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.