Back

A knowledge graph and topological data analysis framework to disentangle the tomato-multi pathogens complex gene regulatory network

multari, m.; carriere, m.; Amoros-Gabarron, x.; damy, a.; lobentanzer, s.; saez-rodriguez, J.; Jaubert, S.; Dugourd, A.; BOTTINI, S.

2025-04-15 systems biology
10.1101/2025.04.09.647963 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global population is rapidly increasing, representing a major challenge for food supply, exacerbated by climate change and environmental degradation. Despite the pivotal role of agriculture, plant health and survival are threatened by various biotic stressors. Although how plants respond to each of these individual stresses is well studied, little is known about how they respond to a combination of many of these bio-aggressors occurring together. To tackle this question, first, we built TomTom, a knowledge graph gathering molecular interactions from nine publicly available databases, including transcription factors- or microRNAs-targets, protein-protein interactions, and functional terms. Then, we selected transcriptomics data of tomato subjected to six distinct pathogens and performed an integrative analysis. We found 5561 candidate genes involved in the multi-stress response of tomato. To study how the response is orchestrated, we mapped those genes in TomTom and extracted a comprehensive gene regulatory network (GRN) composed of 71 transcription factors (TF) and 1786 target genes. By estimating the TF activity, we identified 43 TFs responding either specifically to one or multiple bio-aggressors. GRN analyses with a topological data analysis approach allowed to identify 18 clusters of TFs with similar properties, yielding four main configurations localized in specific regions of the GRN. Finally, we found one NAC and four ERF hubs which cooperatively coordinate the tomato response to multiple pathogens. Our findings allowed to study the complex molecular reprogramming in tomato upon interaction with different biotic agents, providing tools scalable to other questions involving tomato molecular interactions and beyond.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.