A knowledge graph and topological data analysis framework to disentangle the tomato-multi pathogens complex gene regulatory network
multari, m.; carriere, m.; Amoros-Gabarron, x.; damy, a.; lobentanzer, s.; saez-rodriguez, J.; Jaubert, S.; Dugourd, A.; BOTTINI, S.
Show abstract
Global population is rapidly increasing, representing a major challenge for food supply, exacerbated by climate change and environmental degradation. Despite the pivotal role of agriculture, plant health and survival are threatened by various biotic stressors. Although how plants respond to each of these individual stresses is well studied, little is known about how they respond to a combination of many of these bio-aggressors occurring together. To tackle this question, first, we built TomTom, a knowledge graph gathering molecular interactions from nine publicly available databases, including transcription factors- or microRNAs-targets, protein-protein interactions, and functional terms. Then, we selected transcriptomics data of tomato subjected to six distinct pathogens and performed an integrative analysis. We found 5561 candidate genes involved in the multi-stress response of tomato. To study how the response is orchestrated, we mapped those genes in TomTom and extracted a comprehensive gene regulatory network (GRN) composed of 71 transcription factors (TF) and 1786 target genes. By estimating the TF activity, we identified 43 TFs responding either specifically to one or multiple bio-aggressors. GRN analyses with a topological data analysis approach allowed to identify 18 clusters of TFs with similar properties, yielding four main configurations localized in specific regions of the GRN. Finally, we found one NAC and four ERF hubs which cooperatively coordinate the tomato response to multiple pathogens. Our findings allowed to study the complex molecular reprogramming in tomato upon interaction with different biotic agents, providing tools scalable to other questions involving tomato molecular interactions and beyond.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CoVar: A generalizable machine learning approach to identify the coordinated regulators driving variational gene expression 93%
- HELP: A computational framework for labelling and predicting human common and context-specific essential genes 93%
- Application of Modular Response Analysis to Medium- to Large-Size Biological Systems 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- HEMU: an integrated Andropogoneae comparative genomics database and analysis platform 93%
- PTF-Vac: An explainable and generative deep co-learning encoders-decoders system for ab-initio discovery of plant transcription factor binding sites 93%
- Organ-level Gene Regulatory Network models enable the identification of central transcription factors in Solanum lycopersicum 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptome-guided annotation and functional classification of long non-coding RNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana 93%
- Genome-wide identification and characterization of Solanum tuberosum BiP genes reveals the role of the promoter architecture in BiP gene diversity 93%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of differential expression under drought with gene family expansion unique to drought tolerant species predicts candidate genes for drought adaptation in Brassicaceae species. 94%
- Automatic identification and annotation of MYB gene family members in plants 93%
- Automatic annotation of the bHLH gene family in plants 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.