Back

The Impacts of COVID-19 on routine immunization for children in Rwanda.

Mbonigaba, E.; Yu, F.; Renosa, M. D. C.; Cho, F. N.; Chen, Q.; Chen, W.; Denkinger, C. M.; McMahon, S. A.; Chen, S.

2025-04-10 public and global health
10.1101/2025.04.09.25325536 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe most common indirect impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been the interruption of routine immunisation services, resulting in a significant decline in childhood immunisation rates, particularly during the early stages of the pandemic. This study aimed to explore the socio-demographic characteristics associated with continued routine immunisation in Rwanda. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted between January 3rd to March 31st, 2022 amongst mothers from five districts in Rwanda. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine associations between demographic characteristics and the willingness to vaccinate children, considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccination attitudes. ResultsAmong the 2,045 mothers surveyed, 92.2% and 91.6% admitted that their religion and culture support immunisation respectively. Marital status, educational status, and average monthly income were significantly associated with culture and tradition. Out of the 2,045 mothers, 77.3% and 58.7% were concerned about the serious adverse effects of vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines, while 8.1% were concerned with the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. With the exception of age, marital status, and the number of children in the immunisation age bracket, there was a significant association between the perceived risks of vaccination and all other socio-demographic characteristics. ConclusionGlobal routine immunisation was disrupted throughout the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, Rwandas initial preparedness to combat infectious diseases such as Ebola minimized the influence of COVID-19 on routine immunisation in the country. This study suggests an association between routine immunisation and factors such as culture, financial constraints, vaccine misinformation, concern about adverse effects of vaccines, and apprehensions over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.