Back

Biobanking of Biological Samples at Room Temperature

Vangala, R. K.; Kanukollu, S.; M S, P.; Nair, J.; Vangala, A. B.; Shankar, A.; Upadhyay, B.; Palpandi, S.; Nagendran, J.; Nair, P. N.; Murugaian, E. E.

2025-04-09 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.04.08.646969 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biospecimens have become an integral part of life science research, pharma and drug development. There is increased demand for biospecimens from patients with assured quality of collection, processing, and storage. Establishing a biobank with high-quality biospecimens is an expensive aspect due to the requirement of costly freezers and liquid nitrogen facilities. Many studies have explored various storage reagents for biological samples. Still, the need of the hour is the one that can preserve biological samples at ambient room temperature and suitable for diagnosis and research. InstaPRESERVE is an eco/user-friendly solution with long-term sustainable alternative for freezer or liquid nitrogen systems for biobanking. Blood and saliva specimens were collected and stored in InstaPRESERVE at room temperature and conventional storage conditions. The genomics and proteomics analysis of the DNA, RNA, and protein extracted from the -80{degrees}C and InstaPRESERVE stored specimens and fresh specimens indicated that the specimens were well-conserved at room temperature compared to frozen specimens. Innovative technologies and approaches are being evaluated in biobanks for sample integrity, reducing collection, processing, and storage costs, increasing speed and throughput, and reducing energy expenditure. Preserving the biospecimens in InstaPRESERVE at room temperature eliminates expensive storage systems, cold-chain during transportation, and pre-processing requirements. The qualitative and quantitative results of DNA, RNA, and protein ensured stabilized storage for a longer period. The use of InstaPRESERVE as a specimen storage medium is emerging as an alternative in biobanking for specimen storage at room temperature. The existing and proposed biobanks may consider employing InstaPRESERVE as a reliable resource for biospecimens storage.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
36.0%
2
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.5%
3
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
6
BMC Research Notes
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
8
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
9
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
11
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
BioTechniques
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
20
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
27
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%