Ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life and cognitive function after stroke in the Netherlands
Lee, Y. X.; Jellema, K.; Vliet Vlieland, T. P.; van den Wijngaard, I. R.; hofs, d.; Arwert, H.
Show abstract
Background/objectiveVarious studies have demonstrated, European data regarding ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after stroke is scarce and none used patient reported outcomes measurements (PROMs). This study explores whether ethnicity predict HRQOL using PROMs and cognitive function after stroke in the Netherlands. Patients and methodsPatients admitted to the hospital with a first ever stroke were included. Outcome assessments included the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Profile and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D index and EQ-5D-L Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) for HRQOL and the PROMIS Cognitive Function for cognitive functioning. Measurements were done at hospital admission and after 3 and 12 months (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS only at 12 months). Ethnicity (migration background yes/no), other demographics and stroke characteristics were collected at admission. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without a migration background by a multivariate linear mixed-effects model, adjusted for age, sex, education level and severity of stroke (NIHSS at admission). Results262 patients were included, of whom 74 (28.2%) did and 188 (71.8%) did not have a migration background. A significant difference was observed at admission for the physical function score (estimate=3.30, SE=1.25, p=0.01), at three months for anxiety score (estimate=-2.95, SE=1.48, p=0.05) and twelve months for sleep disturbance score (estimate=-5.43, SE=1.61, p<0.01). These results are all to the disadvantage of patients with a migration background. The EQ-5D index and EQ-5D VAS at twelve months follow-up was significantly lower in patients with a migration background compared to patients without a migration background (respectively adjusted B -0.09 (95% CI -0.17; -0.01)) and adjusted B -7.27 (95% CI (-13.99; -0.56)). ConclusionUp to twelve months after hospital admission, stroke patients with a migration background had significantly worse scores regarding several domains of HRQOL compared to patients without a migration background.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 95%
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 94%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The whole day matters after stroke: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a 'sit less, move more, sleep better program early after stroke 94%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 93%
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Outcome Disparities by Insurance Plan and Educational Attainment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation 93%
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 92%
- Prevalence and determinants of persistent symptoms after infection with SARS-CoV-2: Protocol for an observational cohort study (LongCOVID-study) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 93%
- Acute ischemic Stroke in Tsutsugamushi: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms and Risk Factors 90%
- Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin for traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.