Back

The Role of N-acetylcysteine Amide in Acute Graft-versus-host Disease Mouse Model

He, R.; Zheng, W.; Rozing, K.; Moro, C. F.; Li, X.; Yin, Y.; Zhou, W.; Andaloussi, S. E.; Norgren, S.; Zhao, Y.; Hassan, M.

2025-04-11 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.04.07.647501 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains one of the major complications following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), resulting in reduced quality of life, morbidity, and mortality in transplanted patients. Clinical strategies to prevent GvHD are frequently associated with off-target effects and dose-related toxicity. Given that oxidative stress is elevated in allo-HCT recipients and contributes to the pathogenesis of GvHD, the current study aims to characterize the role of N-acetylcysteine amide (NACA), a novel antioxidant, as the prophylactic treatment for acute GvHD. Using a murine GvHD model, we found that oral administration of NACA significantly reduced GvHD severity, prolonged survival, and improved the clinical manifestations and integrity of target organs compared to saline or N-acetylcysteine (NAC) treatment. NACA modulated splenic T cells differentiation with an increase in the regulatory (Treg) subset and a decrease in the cytotoxic (CD8+) subset. Moreover, inflammatory mediators, such as ROS and pro-inflammatory cytokines were downregulated by NACA treatment. In addition, NACA hindered donor T-cell proliferation in the recipients, and restrained Th1 and Th17, but not Th2 polarization. Importantly, NACA did not influence full donor engraftment in bone marrow and spleen. Taken together, our findings provide a new candidate for GvHD prophylactic treatment by targeting oxidative stress that can be easily translated to clinical use. Key PointsO_LINACA provides superior prophylactic effect against aGvHD compared to NAC in an allogeneic transplantation mouse model. C_LIO_LINACA treatment neither showed systemic toxicity nor altered the engraftment of the donor cells. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.9%
3
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
9
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
npj Regenerative Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
npj Vaccines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Advanced Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
30
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%