Back

Hierarchical representation learning of preeclampsia interactome connecting endometrial maturation, placentation, chorioamnionitis, and HELLP syndrome

Sufriyana, H.; Wu, Y.-W.; Su, E. C.-Y.

2025-04-07 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.04.07.25325355
Show abstract

BackgroundExisting proposed pathogenesis for preeclampsia (PE) was only applied for early-onset PE (EOPE). Our previous work identified the transcriptome to decipher EOPE and late-onset PE (LOPE), but the pathogenesis models were not validated. We developed and validated the pathogenesis models by hierarchical representation learning of interactomes connecting endometrial maturation, placentation, chorioamnionitis, and hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme, and low platelet (HELLP) syndrome. MethodsWe utilized 19 gene sets from our previous work to infer interactomes to develop (n=177) and validate (n=352) explainable artificial intelligence models for each PE subtype using deep-insight visible neural network and gradient-weighted class activation mapping. ResultsThe hierarchically learned representations identified novel genes for LOPE, similar to endometrial maturation (MRPL34, DYNLL1), chorioamnionitis (ANKRD13A, SLA), and HELLP syndrome (FAM43A). We also identified novel genes for EOPE, similar to endometrial maturation (SNAP23, PPL, LRRC32), placentation (GPT2, UBE2H, NIPAL3, NIN, KIAA0232, MT1F, DKK3, SLC24A3), and HELLP syndrome (SWAP70, GREM2, GPR146, PIP5K1B, EZR). Nonetheless, a gene for each subtype was frequently studied, i.e., IGF1 (chorioamnionitis) and PAPPA2 (placentation), including LOPE and EOPE samples. ConclusionsOur pathogenesis models connected both endometrial maturation and HELLP syndrome with LOPE and EOPE. However, they were differently connected with chorioamnionitis and placentation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 2%
17.8%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Human Reproduction
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 0.1%
7.9%
5
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 12%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 65%
5.6%
7
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 4%
4.7%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
9
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
2.4%
11
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 13%
0.7%