Back

Association between epigenetic aging acceleration and amyloid biomarkers in bipolar disorder

Fries, G. R.; De La Garza, S.; Zhao, N. O.; Bass, A. W.; Lima, C. N. C.; Kobori, N.; Barichello, T.; Turecki, G.; Schulz, P. E.; Diniz, B. S.; Soares, J. C.

2025-04-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.04.06.25325186 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesBipolar disorder (BD) has been associated with an elevated risk of Alzheimers Disease (AD). We assessed AD biomarkers in BD and tested whether epigenetic aging (EA) acceleration is a potential mechanism driving variability in these markers. Design, Setting, ParticipantsCross-sectional study of n=59 living individuals with BD and n=20 age- and sex-equated control participants, as well as analyses of postmortem brain samples (Brodmann area 9/46) from n=46 individuals with BD. MeasurementsAmyloid beta (A{beta})40, A{beta}42, and total Tau levels were measured in plasma from individuals with BD and controls, and A{beta}42 levels were measured in brains. EA and its acceleration (blood: GrimAge and DunedinPACE; brains: DNAmClockCortical) were estimated for all samples. Individuals with BD were split into quartiles with accelerated or slower EA if they were in the first or fourth quartiles for GrimAge acceleration (AgeAccelGrim), DunedinPACE, or DNAmClockCortical acceleration (DNAmClockCorticalAccel). ResultsIndividuals with BD showed an increase in A{beta}40 (p=.049) and a decrease in the A{beta}42/40 ratio (p=.035) compared to controls. A decrease in the A{beta}42/40 ratio was also found in individuals with BD with high versus low AgeAccelGrim (p=.028). Brain A{beta}42 levels significantly correlated with DNAmClockCorticalAccel (r2=.270, p=.007), with those with high EA acceleration showing higher brain A{beta}42 after controlling for confounders (p=.008). ConclusionsOur results provide preliminary evidence that EA may explain the variability in AD risk in individuals with BD and could act as a target for preventing dementia and AD in BD.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.