A Comparative Study of Predictive model (ECG Buddy) and ChatGPT-4o for Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis via ECG image Analysis: Performance, Accuracy, and Clinical Feasibility
Lee, H.; Yoo, S.; Kim, J.; Cho, Y.; Suh, D.; Lee, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate and timely electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is critical for diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI) in emergency settings. Recent advances in multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs), such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), have shown promise in clinical interpretation for medical imaging. However, whether these models analyze waveform patterns or simply rely on text cues remains unclear, underscoring the need for direct comparisons with dedicated ECG artificial intelligence (AI) tools. MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated and compared AI models for classifying MI using a publicly available 12-lead ECG dataset from Pakistan, categorizing cases into MI-positive (239 images) and MI-negative (689 images). ChatGPT (GPT-4o, version 2024-11-20) was queried with five MI confidence options, whereas ECG Buddy for Windows analyzed the images based on ST- elevation MI, acute coronary syndrome, and myocardial injury biomarkers. ResultsAmong 928 ECG recordings (25.8% MI-positive), ChatGPT achieved an accuracy of 65.95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.80-69.00), area under the curve (AUC) of 57.34% (95% CI: 53.44-61.24), sensitivity of 36.40% (95% CI: 30.30-42.85), and specificity of 76.20% (95% CI: 72.84-79.33). However, ECG Buddy reached an accuracy of 96.98% (95% CI: 95.67-97.99), AUC of 98.8% (95% CI: 98.3-99.43), sensitivity of 96.65% (95% CI: 93.51-98.54), and specificity of 97.10% (95% CI: 95.55-98.22). DeLongs test confirmed that ECG Buddy significantly outperformed ChatGPT (all P < .001). In an error analysis of 40 cases, ChatGPT provided clinically plausible explanations in only 7.5% of cases, whereas 35% were partially correct, 40% were completely incorrect, and 17.5% received no meaningful explanation. ConclusionLLMs such as ChatGPT underperform relative to specialized tools such as ECG Buddy in ECG image-based MI diagnosis. Further training may improve ChatGPT; however, domain- specific AI remains essential for clinical accuracy. The high performance of ECG Buddy underscores the importance of specialized models for achieving reliable and robust diagnostic outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: benchmarking open-source algorithms 97%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
- A recurrent neural network and parallel hidden Markov model algorithm to segment and detect heart murmurs in phonocardiograms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrocardiogram Analysis of Post-Stroke Elderly People Using One-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network Model with Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping 96%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 93%
- Deep ensemble multitask classification of emergency medical call incidents combining multimodal data improves emergency medical dispatch 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting Heart Failure using novel bio-signals and a Knowledge Enhanced Neural Network 97%
- Detection and removal of pacing artifacts prior to automated analysis of 12-lead ECG 96%
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.