Back

Non-linear Age-related Change in Human Interleukin-11 and the receptor subunit alpha DNA Methylation

Shimura, A.; Dwaraka, V. B.; Yamanishi, K.; Seki, T.; Nishiguchi, T.; Aoyama, B.; Ishii, T.; Phuong, N. J.; Gorantla, N.; Nguyen, H. D.; Santiago, T.; Nishitani, S.; Smith, R.; Shinozaki, G.

2025-04-08 genetics
10.1101/2025.04.01.646733 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionInterleukin-11 (IL-11) is a cytokine involved in inflammatory processes and a previous study showed that blocking or knocking down IL11 in mice prolongs a healthy lifespan. This study investigates DNA methylation (DNAm) changes in the IL11 and IL-11 receptor subunit alpha (IL-11RA) gene across ages to reveal how aging might influence IL-11 production and sensitivity. MethodsA genome-wide DNAm database focusing on Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine (CpG) sites within the IL11 and IL11RA was analyzed. Hierarchical regression analyses examined the relationship between DNAm, age, and the squared age term for quadratic associations. ResultsThe database comprised 10,297 samples (5,156 males and 5,141 females) with a mean age of 53.9 years (SD = 14.1 years). The majority of IL11 and IL11RA CpG sites in the TSS1500 and 3UTR regions exhibited significant inverse U-shaped associations with age. DNAm levels were low during youth, increased in middle age (40s-50s), and decreased again in older age. ConclusionThe observed inverse U-shaped DNAm patterns in the IL11 and IL11RA suggest n non-linear, age-related regulation of IL-11 expression and sensitivity. These findings indicate that IL-11 may have different roles across life stages and suggest that therapeutic interventions targeting IL-11 should consider age-specific effects.

Published in Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports (predicted rank #7) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.