Back

A Wildlife Health Outbreak Response Table-top Exercise for Pandemic Preparedness Planning

Ahyong, V.; Ayscue, P.; Gowen, R.; Spottiswoode, N.; Alex, C. E.; Anis, E.; Beiting, D. P.; Gibison, M.; Gordian-Rivera, E. I.; Greening, S.; Keatts, L.; Larsen, R. S.; Miller, E.; Niewinski, B.; Gagne, R. B.; Tato, C. M.; Ellis, J.; Murphy, L.

2025-04-03 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2025.04.01.646690 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Zoonotic diseases have received significantly more attention over the last few decades, emerging with increasing frequency and causing the majority of notable disease outbreaks in this century, including the COVID-19 pandemic. As human activities and shifting climate patterns induce changes in the environment that alter habitat and range of reservoir species, the potential for human and animal interactions will increase and enhance the opportunity for spillover. Thus, any emergency response preparedness planning must take into account the function and coordination of agencies across the sectors of human, animal and environmental health. Within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania a table-top exercise was performed to evaluate a multi-agency response during a hypothetical zoonotic disease investigation. The exercise was evaluated by the participants to gain feedback on the overall process and lessons learned. Here, we describe the tabletop exercise scenario and the insights gained. We found that differences in operational structure create challenges for interdepartmental communication and in the ability to resource a coordinated response, highlighting opportunities to develop infrastructure that will facilitate future actions. A set of recommendations are outlined that may enhance cross-agency activities and promote more effective and efficient emergency response.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.