QRS fragmentation as a predictor of clinical events in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
Rodriguez-Lopez, C.; Miguel Garcia, L.; Balaguer German, J.; Cortes Garcia, M.; Acena, A.; Garcia Talavera, C.; Romero Otero, J. M.; Lazaro Rivera, C.; Bravo Calero, L.; Diaz Cortegana, F.; Tunon, J.; Rubio Campal, J. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundQRS fragmentation (QRSf) has been associated with a worse prognosis in several cardiac diseases, although limited evidence exists on QRSf in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine whether QRSf is associated with clinical events in patients receiving CRT. MethodsQRSf included various patterns present on at least 2 contiguous leads in 3 different territories: anteroseptal (V1-V4), lateral (V5-V6, I, aVL), and inferior (II, III, aVF). Mortality, heart failure (HF) admissions, and arrhythmic events (AEs) were studied. ResultsWe included 244 patients (mean age, 72 {+/-} 10 years; 80% male). CRT with a defibrillator (CRT-D) was implanted in 176 patients. Before implantation, mean QRS width was 158 {+/-} 29 ms, mean LVEF was 25 {+/-} 9%, and 61% had QRSf. With pacing, new QRSf developed in 11.9% of patients and QRSf resolved in 11.5%. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 36.9% of patients died, 37.3% were hospitalized for HF, and 16.5% of those with CRT-D had an AE. On multivariate analysis, pre-implantation QRSf was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR), 2.79; 95% CI [1.54-5.05]), hospitalization for HF (HR, 3.57; 95% CI [1.94-6.58]), and AEs (HR, 6.99; 95% CI [1.54-31.68]). Patients with persistent or newly developed QRSf after implantation had a worse prognosis than those without QRSf. ConclusionsQRSf before or after CRT has significant prognostic value for all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and AEs, and presence of QRSf after implantation also has prognostic significance. Patients with QRSf before or after CRT should be observed more closely, as they have a worse prognosis.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship of mild to moderate impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction with fatal ventricular arrhythmic events in cardiac sarcoidosis 97%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 97%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 98%
- High Initial Heart Rate Score is an Independent Predictor of New Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Pacemaker Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction 96%
- Right bundle branch pacing: criteria, characteristics and outcomes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 97%
- Atrial functional substrates for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation 95%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study 97%
- Autologous cardiac micrografts as support therapy to coronary artery bypass surgery 95%
- Simultaneous assessment of mechanical and electrical function in Langendorff-perfused ex-vivo mouse heart 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective 96%
- Lifestyle physical activity intensity and rapid-rate non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 94%
- Cardiac Microstructural Abnormalities Identify Women at Risk of Incident Heart Failure 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.