Back

Towards an open analysis ecosystem for Plasmodium genomic epidemiology

Ruybal-Pesantez, S.; Amaya-Romero, J.; Berube, S.; Brazeau, N. F.; Diop, M. F.; Hathaway, N.; Hendry, J.; McCann, K.; Murie, K.; Murphy, M.; Niare, K.; Phelan, J.; Schaffner, S. F.; Simkin, A.; Taylor, A. R.; Greenhouse, B.; Wesolowski, A.; Verity, R. J.

2025-04-01 public and global health
10.1101/2025.04.01.25325032 medRxiv
Show abstract

Major advances in Plasmodium sequencing approaches, bioinformatic pipelines, and data analysis tools have provided valuable insights into malaria epidemiology from parasite genomic data. However, translating genetic data into actionable information for decision-makers remains a challenge. Significant barriers limit the integration of these advances into a functional data analysis ecosystem that produces standardized, interpretable results for use by national malaria control programs. The Plasmodium Genomic Epidemiology (PlasmoGenEpi) network convened 18 subject matter experts across 15 institutions at the Reproducibility, Accessibility, Documentation, and Interoperability Standards Hackathon in 2023 (RADISH23) to identify available analysis tools, evaluate software standards, improve documentation, and outline workflows. Eight use cases for genomic data were identified, and a subset were developed into analysis workflows in terms of a series of connected functionalities. Software tools were then mapped against functionalities to outline a modular approach to data analysis for these use cases. In addition to outlining workflows, a set of objective criteria were developed for evaluating software standards. Forty Plasmodium genomic analysis tools were identified, of which 22 were prioritized for software standards evaluation. Additional tutorials were developed for 10 tools in the form of reproducible code applied to shared datasets. These resources are available on PGEforge (mrc- ide.github.io/PGEforge), a new community resource that serves as a central, open repository for current and future resources for malaria genomic data analysis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.3%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.6%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 14%
7.7%
4
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
6
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
8
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
9
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
11
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
13
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
21
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%