Implementation of culturally responsive communication for racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minoritized patients when screened for COVID-19 vaccinations: A scoping review
Kalita, N.; Corr, P. G.; Ward, M. C.; Xavier, J.; McDonald, P. L.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated long-standing healthcare disparities, disproportionately affecting racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minoritized populations. Structural inequities fuel medical mistrust and hinder equitable vaccine access. Culturally responsive communication (CRC) is a critical strategy in primary care that has the potential to improve patient-provider interactions and vaccine acceptance. ObjectivesThis scoping review examines how CRC is conceptualized and implemented in clinical interactions related to COVID-19 vaccination and booster screening for minoritized populations. It assesses the scope of CRC research, the clarity of definitions, the extent of implementation, and its clinical applicability. MethodsFollowing Arksey and OMalleys framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a literature search across four databases, analyzing studies published between November 2019 and 2022. Extracted data included CRC definitions, communication strategies, and interventions from 22 eligible studies. ResultsResearch on CRC in the context of COVID-19 vaccination is limited and inconsistent. Most studies focused on Black and Hispanic populations, with a critical gap in research addressing sexual and gender minorities. CRC terminology was often interchangeable with concepts like cultural competence, leading to definitional inconsistencies. Because public health messaging was a primary focus, direct clinical applications of CRC were underexplored. DiscussionOur findings highlight an urgent need for a standardized CRC framework to enhance healthcare equity. The absence of a clear, universally accepted definition hinders CRCs practical application and measurability in clinical settings. Future research should refine CRC conceptualization, establish measurable interventions, and expand inclusivity to sexual and gender minorities to foster more equitable healthcare practices.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “All of the things to everyone everywhere”: A mixed methods analysis of community perspectives on equitable access to monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID-19 95%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 94%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 94%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 94%
- Comparing in-person, blended and virtual training interventions; a real-world evaluation of HIV capacity building programs in 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 95%
- The Lifecycle of Electronic Health Record Data in HIV-Related Big Data Studies: A Qualitative Study of Instances of and Potential Opportunities to Minimize Bias 92%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 93%
- Determinants of Periodic Health Examination Uptake: Insights from a Jordanian Cross-Sectional Study 92%
- Caregivers’ Perspective: Satisfaction With Healthcare Services At The Paediatric Specialist Clinic Of The National Referral Centre In Malaysia 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.