Back

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Electric Stimulation on Sleep in Healthy Adults

Takeuchi, H.; Motomura, Y.; Imamura, A.; Takemi, M.; Hosomi, K.; Kishi, A.

2025-04-01 neurology
10.1101/2025.03.30.25324699 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial electrical stimulation (tES) has gained attention because of its potential to modulate human sleep physiology. However, its efficacy in healthy populations remains unclear. ObjectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of tES on sleep in healthy adults. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across five electronic databases from January 5 to 10, 2023, to retrieve articles administering tES and evaluating its effects on sleep in healthy adults. The Cochrane Collaborations tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and robust variance estimation, with subgroup analyses and meta-regression to examine conditional and moderation effects. ResultsAmong the 1,182 identified articles, 39 were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 14 (N = 297) met the criteria for meta-analysis. The overall effect of tES on sleep was negligible (estimate: 0.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.18 to 0.19), with substantial heterogeneity. Subgroup meta-analysis revealed that pre-sleep tES prolonged sleep latency (estimate: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.11), whereas transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) increased total sleep time (estimate: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.27). Meta-regression analysis showed that tES efficacy was attenuated with increasing age ({beta}: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.00). ConclusionsAlthough tES does not appear to have a substantial overall effect on sleep, tACS may improve total sleep time, and pre-sleep offline tES may prolong sleep latency. Further well-designed studies are warranted to confirm these findings and minimize potential biases.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.