Back

A formal relation between two disparate mathematical algorithms is ascertained from biological circuit analyses

Liu, C.; Bowen, E. F.; Granger, R.

2025-04-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.28.645962 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We simulate and formally analyze the emergent operations from the specific anatomical layout and physiological activation patterns of a particular local excitatory-inhibitory circuit architecture that occurs throughout superficial layers of cortex. The circuit carries out two effective procedures on its inputs, depending on the strength of its local feedback inhibitory cells. Both procedures can be formally characterized in terms of well-studied statistical operations: clustering, and component analyses, under high-feedback-inhibition and low-feedback-inhibition conditions, respectively. The detailed nature of these clustering and component procedures is studied in the context of extensive related literatures in statistics, machine learning, and computational neuroscience. The two operations (clustering and component analysis) have not previously been shown to contain deep connections, let alone to each be derivable from a single overarching algorithmic precursor. The identification of this deep formal mathematical connection, which arose from analysis of a detailed biological circuit, represents a rare instance of novel mathematical relations arising from biological analyses. 1

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.5%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
6
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
11
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
13
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
21
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
25
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%