Back

Standardization of postmortem human brainstem along the rostrocaudal axis to accommodate for heterogeneity in samples

Celada, M.; Zaarour, N.; Cheung, J.; Gross, C.; Lim, A.; Buchman, A. S.; Saberi, P.; Varma, G.; VanderHorst, V.

2025-03-31 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.26.645559 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human postmortem brain tissues provide an indispensable resource that is crucial for the understanding of neurological conditions, whether related to pathology subtype, burden, distribution or cell-type specificity. Pathology staging protocols provide guidelines for standardized sampling of brain tissues, but cover only a subset of regions affected by pathologies. Thus, to study how various neuropathologies and cell types in highly specialized circuit nodes correlate with functions specifically served by these nodes, additional protocols are necessary. This especially applies to brainstem tissues due to the small dimension of regions of interest and interindividual variability of specimens, whether due to procurement or intrinsic differences. Here we systematically assessed factors contributing to heterogeneity in the length of whole brainstem samples and then presented a standardized approach to reproducibly assign rostrocaudal levels, with standardization relying upon readily identifiable internal landmarks. We validated this approach using postmortem MRI imaging. Standardized brainstem length correlated positively with subject height and negatively with subject age of death. By providing a reference series, reproducible levels can be assigned to individual histological sections or MRI images, i.e. when full brainstem specimens are not available and irrespective of platform, promoting reproducibility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.4%
4
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
9
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
12
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
27
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
30
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%