Back

Clinical care and therapeutic practice of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) and effectiveness of faricimab in treatment-naive patients in Germany - ZEUS research project

Augustin, A. J.; Theine, F. F.; Kaymak, H.; Clauss, J.; Schimitzek, T.; Zortel, M.; Bluemich, S.; Sader-Moritz, A.

2025-03-27 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.03.26.25324686
Show abstract

BackgroundNeovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) represent the leading causes of vision impairment and blindness among the elderly population and people with diabetes, respectively. To reduce disease burden and improve disease management, highly effective therapies and optimal treatment are of major importance. In September 2022, faricimab was approved for the treatment of nAMD and DME in Germany, allowing a treatment approach with dual Ang-2/VEGF-inhibition. This research project was conducted to investigate the clinical care and therapeutic practice in German nAMD and DME patients. Furthermore, by evaluating upload patterns in real-world practice, this study aimed to assess the use of faricimab in treatment-naive patients who received faricimab as a first-line treatment at these centers. Data on visual acuity and drying of the retina was collected in a descriptive manner. MethodsZEUS is a multicenter retrospective analysis of anonymized routinely collected data on patients with nAMD or DME who have been treated with intravitreal injections (IVT) between October 2022 and September 2024. A total of 24 sites (ophthalmologic practices or centers) across Germany reported predominant IVT regimen, drug upload strategies and diagnostic imaging techniques used in the routine care of patients with nAMD and DME in an electronic case report form (eCRF). For the subset of IVT injection-naive patients receiving faricimab data were extracted from patient charts and entered in an anonymized aggregated form into eCRF. Analysis included proportion of IVT injection-naive patients treated with faricimab in first-line, baseline characteristics of these patients/eyes, and reduction of fluid in the macula and changes in visual acuity during faricimab upload phase. ResultsThe majority of sites (62.5%) applied a treat-and-extent (T&E) regimen, regardless of the chosen IVT. In case of faricimab the predominant upload scheme was 4 injections applied by 50% of sites, compared to three injections for other IVTs (58.3%) depending on the disease (nAMD/DME). OCT displayed the standard diagnostic at all sites (100.0%), other diagnostic procedures such as fluorescein angiography (FA, 62.5%) and OCT-A (25%) were applied less often. Out of the 24 sites, more than half initiated faricimab as first-line therapy in [≥]20% of patients. More than 20% achieved a CRT reduction of either 40-60%, 20-40% or 0-20% during faricimab upload; a reduction of more than 80% was achieved in 14.4% of nAMD eyes. The majority of DME eyes (43.9%) displayed a CRT reduction of 20-40%. In the faricimab upload phase, absence of IRF was achieved in 67.2% of nAMD eyes, while an absence of only SRF and both IRF and SRF was seen in 65.0% and 56.7% of eyes. Approximately 80% of DME eyes were free of SRF in the upload phase. The main reason for using faricimab as first-line therapy was to achieve an increase in injection intervals and best effectiveness. Discontinuation rates were low. ConclusionThis is the first analysis of general nAMD and DME treatment modalities as well as real-world effectiveness of faricimab in a large cohort of treatment-naive patients in Germany. Sites prefer individual approaches based on patients needs. First-line treatment with faricimab resulted in visual acuity gain during the faricimab upload phase in a real-world setting. These findings may help to better understand treatment strategies and first-line use of faricimab in nAMD and DME in Germany.

Matching journals

1
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
220× avg
2
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
159× avg
3
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.4%
91× avg
4
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.4%
117× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 48%
10.7%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 4%
4.7× avg
7
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 0.3%
17× avg
8
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
44× avg
9
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 62%
2.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 9%
2.8× avg
11
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 3%
5.2× avg
12
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.9%
18× avg
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 9%
2.4× avg
14
British Journal of Cancer
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 3%
8.9× avg
15
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 49%
0.8%
16
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 12%
0.8%
17
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 39%
0.8%
18
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 11%
1.5× avg
19
Annals of Translational Medicine
AME Publishing Company · based on 14 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg
20
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 18%
0.7%