Back

Rejuvenated human amniotic fluid stem cells: a superior source of standardized induced mesenchymal stem cells for enhanced therapeutic applications

Corcelli, M.; Petzendorfer, E.; Vlahova, F.; Hawkins, K.; Caruso, C. A.; Hasan, M. M.; Durrant, K.; David, A.; Dijk, F. S. v.; Guillot, P. V.

2025-03-26 cell biology
10.1101/2025.03.25.645040 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human fetal mesenchymal stem cells (hfMSCs) present advantageous characteristics compared to their adult counterparts and have emerged as potent cells in the field of regenerative medicine. In the context of skeletal regeneration, human amniotic fluid stem cells (AFSCs) have been shown to improve the quality and structure of the bone extracellular matrix in an experimental model of severe osteogenesis imperfecta. However, primary hfMSCs undergo replicative senescence during in vitro expansion, along with a progressive decrease in plasticity and tissue repair potential. To overcome this challenge, we rejuvenated AFSC to pluripotency using non-integrative episomal reprogramming and subsequently re-derived the cells towards the mesoderm to obtain induced MSCs (iMSCs). We found that iMSCs have a slower proliferation rate compared to their parental cell line (40h{+/-}2h vs. 29h{+/-}5h) but retain the multipotency and differentiation potential characteristic of MSCs. Comparative genomic analysis revealed that iMSCs express higher levels of genes involved in maintaining stemness, cell signaling, adhesion and migration, as well as promoting osteoblast differentiation, whilst AFSC expressed higher levels of genes involved in cell proliferation. In addition, iMSCs secrete small extracellular vesicles (iEVs) that have the potential to stimulate fibroblast migration, a key process in tissue repair and wound healing. Together, these data suggest that resetting the epigenetic clock of primary hfMSCs may represent a promising strategy to address the limitations associated with primary cell use and enhance their therapeutic potential.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
3
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.1%
5
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
15
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
European Journal of Cell Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
19
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
20
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%