Trust in healthcare providers, information sources, and concerns for new maternal vaccines among pregnant and lactating women in Kenya
Schue, J. L.; Fesshaye, B.; Miller, E.; Singh, P.; Sauer, M.; Njogu, R.; Jalango, R.; Nyiro, J.; Karron, R. A.; Limaye, R. J.
Show abstract
New maternal vaccines have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for infants from common illnesses that pose the greatest risk in the earliest phase of their life. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory infections among infants under six months of age. With the recent approval of a maternal vaccine for RSV, this study aimed to understand decision-making factors among pregnant and lactating women for receiving a newly licensed vaccine during pregnancy. Pregnant and lactating women from two counties in Kenya, Nakuru and Mombasa, were recruited to complete a cross-sectional survey in August-September 2022. The survey explored topics of trust in various types of sources for information about new maternal vaccines, the importance of a healthcare providers recommendation of a new maternal vaccine, and concerns about new maternal vaccines. We surveyed 400 pregnant and lactating women. In both counties, information about the new vaccine was most trusted when coming from healthcare providers, and least trusted when coming from social media. Womens intention to receive a new maternal vaccine was heavily influenced by a positive recommendation from a healthcare provider. The greatest concerns about a new vaccine were side effects and the vaccines ingredients. The information and recommendation from a healthcare provider are important influences on decision-making for new maternal vaccines. As a new maternal immunization for RSV becomes more available, healthcare providers should be engaged early to reduce vaccine hesitancy amongst providers and equip providers with appropriate information tailored to pregnant women about the RSV maternal vaccine.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Contextualizing future maternal RSV vaccination acceptance and trust among pregnant and lactating women in Kenya: A latent class analysis 97%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs in Togo: Findings from two cross-sectional surveys 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated risk factors among first antenatal care attendees in Zambia, 2021-2022: a repeated cross-sectional study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Critical success factors for high routine immunization performance: A case study of Nepal 94%
- Demographic and psychological correlates of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination intentions in a sample of Canadian families 94%
- Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines and Perceptions about COVID-19 and Its Vaccines in Bangladesh 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Midwives’ attitudes toward participation of pregnant women in a preventive vaccine hypothetical clinical trial 96%
- Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention: perception and willingness of expectant parents in the Netherlands 95%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the level and determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in Kenya 96%
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare staff and students of a tertiary institution in South Africa 96%
- “Where the truth really lies”: Listening to voices from African American communities in the Southern States about COVID-19 vaccine information and communication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability Among Refugees and Other Migrant Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review 95%
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 95%
- COVID-19 vaccine access and attitudes among people experiencing homelessness from pilot mobile phone survey in Los Angeles, CA 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.