Back

Clinical Validation of Self-Measurement for Anogenital Distance in Women

Dinsdale, N. L.; Maruk, J.; Bushell, A.; Crespi, B. J.

2025-03-24 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.03.23.25324478
Show abstract

Anogenital distance (AGD), the length from the anus to specific genital landmarks, is a well validated, testosterone sensitive, sexually dimorphic biomarker used in many kinds of medical and evolutionary research in diverse species of mammals, including humans. Current research into the effects of testosterone on womens reproductive health and disease is motivating increased interest in measuring female AGD. Studies quantifying female AGD typically employ a clinician, such as a gynecologist or nurse, to conduct the measurements. This methodology maximizes accuracy but imposes notable limitations on data collection. All participants submitted self-measurements online and completed a small set of questionnaires, including tests assessing spatial cognition. The accuracy of AGD self-measurements, based on agreement between self- and clinic-measurements, was moderate. Measurement accuracy was predicted by performance on the mental rotation test, such that women who performed better on this test demonstrated greater accuracy in measuring the anus to posterior fourchette distance. We describe ideas for improving the accuracy of the self-measurement technique. Self-measurement of AGD would increase the number and diversity of women represented in studies of reproductive health, reduce research expenses, and expedite research into the effects of prenatal testosterone and endocrine disruption on female health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Reproduction
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 24%
17.5%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 5%
15.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 0.9%
8.6%
5
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 4%
5.1%
6
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
2.6%
7
Pain
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
1.8%
8
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
1.5%
10
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
11
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 32%
1.5%
13
Psychoneuroendocrinology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 19%
0.9%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 19%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 8%
0.8%
24
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 15%
0.5%
28
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 54%
0.5%
29
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 13%
0.5%
30
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 20%
0.5%