Back

A data-informed approach for engineering in-vitro experiment design to decipher key features of invasive breast cancer cell phenotypes

Shah, L. V.; Breschi, V.; Tirella, A.

2025-03-25 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.03.21.643499 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The intrinsic complexity of biological processes often hides the role of dynamic microenvironmental cues in the development of pathological states. The use of micro-physiological systems (MPS) offers new technological platforms designed to model the dynamics of tissue-specific microenvironments in vitro and to holistically understand healthy and pathological states. In our previous works, we reported on engineering breast critical tumor microenvironment features, including matrix stiffness, pH, and fluid flow, and use the MPSs to study breast cancer cells phenotypes. By studying different microenvironments mimicking normal and tumor breast tissues, we obtained high-dimensional data using two distinctive human breast cell lines (i.e., MDA-MB231, MCF-7) investigating biomarkers commonly used in cancer in vitro models as cell proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and breast cancer stem cell markers (B-CSC). We herein report on a new approach used to explore the complexity of MPSs and the high dimensional datasets: we introduce an innovative machine learning (ML) based platform employing unsupervised k-means clustering and feature extraction to identify key markers that differentiated invasive from non-invasive breast cell phenotypes. This novel data-driven approach streamlines experimental design and emphasizes the translational potential of integrating MPS-derived insights with ML to refine prognostic tools and personalize therapeutic strategies. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=78 SRC="FIGDIR/small/643499v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4f947eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9e1aedorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f9fe8corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b6b91d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.8%
2
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
8
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
9
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
20
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
22
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%