Synthesizing evidence regarding artificial intelligence generated radiological reports based on medical images: a scoping review protocol.
Feng, W.; Yazdani, A.; Bornet, A.; Platon, A.; Teodoro, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionConsidering numerous radiological images and the heavy workload of writing corresponding reports in clinical work, it is significant to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to facilitate this process and reduce the burden of radiologists. In the past few years, particularly with the advent of vision language models, some works explored generating radiological reports directly from images. However, despite some efforts demonstrated in previous studies, limitations in AI-generated radiological reports persist. Current research mainly focuses on detecting abnormalities, rather than generating textual reports from medical images. The evidence for AI application in radiological report writing has not been synthesized. This scoping review aims to map the current literature on the engagement of AI-generating radiological reports based on images. Methods and analysisFollowing a well-established scoping review methodology, five stages are provided: i) determining the research question, ii) searching strategy, iii) inclusion/exclusion criteria, iv) data extraction, and v) results analysis. Four databases will be applied to search peer-reviewed literature from January 2016 to February 2025. A two-stage screening process will be conducted by two independent reviewers to determine the eligibility of articles, and only those regarding AI-generated radiological reports will be included. All data from eligible articles will be extracted and analyzed using narrative and descriptive analyses, presenting in a standard form. Ethic and disseminationEthic approval is no required in this scoping review. Experts from Hospital of University of Geneva will be consulted to provide professional insight and feedback regarding the study findings and help with dissemination activities in peer-reviewed publications or academic presentations
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 95%
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 93%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 94%
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 91%
- GPT for RCTs?: Using AI to measure adherence to reporting guidelines 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- tbiExtractor: A framework for Extracting Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements from Radiology Reports 95%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 93%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 94%
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 92%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking Deep Learning-based Image Retrieval of Oral Tumor Histology 93%
- “This is a quiz” Premise Input: A Key to Unlocking Higher Diagnostic Accuracy in Large Language Models 93%
- Effects of contrast-medium and vertebral measurement level on computed tomography-based body composition parameters of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.