Back

Nanopore adaptive sampling for bacterial identification from periprosthetic joint replacement tissue

Street, T. L.; Bejon, P.; Leach, L.; Oakley, S.; Young, B. C.; Sanderson, N. D.

2025-03-14 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.03.14.25323961 medRxiv
Show abstract

2.Metagenomic approaches to diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections promise more accurate and more rapid diagnosis. However, the high host DNA to bacterial DNA ratio is a challenge. Nanopore adaptive sampling (AS) can be used to preferentially sequence more of the infecting organism. Here, we evaluate AS using clinical samples from infected prosthetic joints to determine the absolute fold enrichment achieved. We found that AS achieved a range of 1.61 to 1.96-fold higher absolute fold enrichment for bacterial sequenced bases using AS over control pores. In this limited sample set, AS did not impact bacterial diagnosis overall but led to a modest increase in the bacterial sequence available without any obvious cost. 3. Impact statementMetagenomic approaches offer the possibility to rapidly detect the cause of an infection and to provide information on drug susceptibility. Implementing this technique is challenging because samples collected from patients contain high levels of human DNA which can obscure detection of bacterial DNA. Reducing the amount of human DNA sequenced would allow easier detection of bacteria. This study assessed a sequencing protocol that rejects human DNA during the sequencing process known as adaptive sampling (AS), specifically as concerns samples from patients with joint infections. Our findings demonstrate that AS can increase bacterial sequencing efficiency. However, these modest improvements did not significantly enhance bacterial identification in our small sample set, although we did not detect additional costs associated with using AS. The study confirms modest utility of AS in real-world clinical samples and extends current literature by applying AS to joint infection. The implications of this method extend to clinical microbiology, where rapid and accurate pathogen detection can significantly impact patient outcomes. 4. Data summaryThe authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article, through supplementary data files, or in publicly accessible repositories. Nanopore sequencing fastq data are available in the ENA under project accession: PRJEB78709.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
3
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
4
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
5
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
6
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.2%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
22
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
23
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
27
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%