Nanopore adaptive sampling for bacterial identification from periprosthetic joint replacement tissue
Street, T. L.; Bejon, P.; Leach, L.; Oakley, S.; Young, B. C.; Sanderson, N. D.
Show abstract
2.Metagenomic approaches to diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections promise more accurate and more rapid diagnosis. However, the high host DNA to bacterial DNA ratio is a challenge. Nanopore adaptive sampling (AS) can be used to preferentially sequence more of the infecting organism. Here, we evaluate AS using clinical samples from infected prosthetic joints to determine the absolute fold enrichment achieved. We found that AS achieved a range of 1.61 to 1.96-fold higher absolute fold enrichment for bacterial sequenced bases using AS over control pores. In this limited sample set, AS did not impact bacterial diagnosis overall but led to a modest increase in the bacterial sequence available without any obvious cost. 3. Impact statementMetagenomic approaches offer the possibility to rapidly detect the cause of an infection and to provide information on drug susceptibility. Implementing this technique is challenging because samples collected from patients contain high levels of human DNA which can obscure detection of bacterial DNA. Reducing the amount of human DNA sequenced would allow easier detection of bacteria. This study assessed a sequencing protocol that rejects human DNA during the sequencing process known as adaptive sampling (AS), specifically as concerns samples from patients with joint infections. Our findings demonstrate that AS can increase bacterial sequencing efficiency. However, these modest improvements did not significantly enhance bacterial identification in our small sample set, although we did not detect additional costs associated with using AS. The study confirms modest utility of AS in real-world clinical samples and extends current literature by applying AS to joint infection. The implications of this method extend to clinical microbiology, where rapid and accurate pathogen detection can significantly impact patient outcomes. 4. Data summaryThe authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article, through supplementary data files, or in publicly accessible repositories. Nanopore sequencing fastq data are available in the ENA under project accession: PRJEB78709.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine-learning based detection of adventitious microbes in T-cell therapy cultures using long read sequencing 95%
- Rapid nanopore metagenomic sequencing and predictive susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures from intensive care patients with sepsis 95%
- GenomicGapID: Leveraging Spatial Distribution of Conserved Genomic Sites for Broad-Spectrum Microbial Identification 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis and antimicrobial sensitivity prediction of canine bacterial infections 95%
- Optimised use of Oxford Nanopore Flowcells for Hybrid Assemblies 95%
- Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of microbiome enrichment and host DNA depletion in human vaginal samples using Oxford Nanopore's adaptive sequencing 94%
- Manually weighted taxonomy classifiers improve species-specific rumen microbiome analysis compared to unweighted or average weighted taxonomy classifiers 92%
- VarLOCK - sequencing independent, rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern for point-of-care testing, qPCR pipelines and national wastewater surveillance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Species Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction in Orthopaedic Device Infection 97%
- Accurate and Reproducible Whole-Genome Genotyping for Bacterial Genomic Surveillance with Nanopore Sequencing Data 94%
- The clinical utility of two high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing workflows for taxonomic assignment of unidentifiable bacterial pathogens in MALDI-TOF MS 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.