Back

Establishment of in silico prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy response from active mitotic gene signature in non-small cell lung cancer

Kwon, E.-J.; Hwang, H. S.; Chang, E.; An, J.-Y.; Cha, H.-J.

2025-03-15 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2025.03.14.25322930
Show abstract

Conventional chemotherapeutics exploit cancers hallmark of active cell cycling, primarily targeting mitotic cells. Consequently, the mitotic index (MI), representing the proportion of cells in mitosis, serves as both a prognostic biomarker for cancer progression and a predictive marker for chemo-responsiveness. In this study, we developed a transcriptome signature to predict the chemotherapeutic responsiveness based on the Active Mitosis Signature Enrichment Score (AMSES), a computational metric previously established to estimate the active mitosis using multi-omics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung cancer cohorts, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) patients. Leveraging advanced machine learning techniques, we enhanced the predictive power of AMSES and developed AMSES for chemo-responsiveness, termed A4CR. Comparative analysis revealed a strong correlation between A4CR and the MI of 69 cases from separated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort. The utility of A4CR as a therapeutic biomarker was validated through in silico analysis of public datasets, encompassing transcriptomic profiles of cancer cell lines (CCLs) and their corresponding multiple drug response data as well as clinicogenomic data from TCGA. These findings highlight the potential of integrating gene signatures with machine learning and large-scale datasets to advance precision oncology and improve therapeutic decision-making for cancer patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 4%
15.7%
2
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 0.4%
13.0%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 56%
7.8%
4
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 10%
7.8%
5
Briefings in Bioinformatics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.6%
6
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 0.5%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
2.9%
8
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
based on 19 papers
Top 0.7%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
1.6%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Emerging Microbes & Infections
based on 20 papers
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
16
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
17
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
19
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
25
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
26
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 14%
0.7%
27
PNAS Nexus
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%