Back

Assessing the University Students Attitudes Toward Organ Donation in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Al-Ghawanmeh, R.; Almaqableh, H. O.; Al-Qudah, M.; Abu Sultan, Y.; Alwreekat, S.; AlShakhanbeh, L. S.; Ayoub, M.; Alhalawani, M. M. M.; Al-Omari, D.; Al-Tarawneh, Z.; AL-Ajlouny, S.; Fargaly, A.

2025-03-13 pathology
10.1101/2025.03.12.25323879 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOrgan donation rates in Jordan are low despite improvements in healthcare. Cultural, religious, and familial beliefs influence attitudes toward donation. University students, as future societal leaders, are crucial in understanding these attitudes, yet research on this group in Jordan is limited. This study aims to assess university students attitudes toward organ donation in Jordan and identify factors influencing their willingness to donate. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,548 university students from five universities in Jordan. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire assessing demographics, attitudes toward organ donation (measured with a 5-point Likert scale), and willingness to donate. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression. ResultsSeventy-two percent of students expressed a willingness to donate organs. The mean attitude score was 56.05/80, indicating moderate attitudes. Factors such as age, marital status, and willingness to donate significantly influenced attitudes. The strongest predictor of positive attitudes was willingness to donate. ConclusionUniversity students in Jordan show moderate attitudes toward organ donation, with key influences from willingness to donate, age, and cultural beliefs. Targeted education and awareness campaigns are needed to address cultural barriers and improve organ donation rates.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.