Back

Point Of Care Thyroglobulin Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Rapid Detection of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma Metastasis to Cervical Lymph Nodes

Angel, S.; Yoel, U.; Kristollari, K.; Fraenkel, M.; Bosin, E.; Elezra, M.; Axelrod, T.; Marks, R. S.

2025-03-17 oncology
10.1101/2025.03.12.25323841 medRxiv
Show abstract

Metastatic cervical lymph nodes (LN) are detected in 20-30% of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Current guidelines recommend that once a cervical LN is suspected to be DTC metastasis during a neck ultrasound (US) procedure, it should be investigated via a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy for cytological evaluation and saline washout of the needle for thyroglobulin (Tg) measurement (FNA-Tg). Since Tg is a protein produced exclusively by thyroid follicular cells, a positive FNA-Tg result establishes the diagnosis of metastatic DTC irrespective of cytology. The conventional, immunoassay-based, FNA-Tg washout requires a laboratory and skilled personnel. We developed a semi-quantitative, lateral flow-based method which was shown to detect at the point-of-care (POC), within 10 minutes, positive Tg samples in needle washouts of a suspicious LN at the site of FNA biopsy. In the pre-clinical phase, the POC-Tg limit of detection was determined to be at a concentration equal to 5 ng/mL, after a 1 mL dilution with normal saline. Our prototype was optimized by evaluating different components: types of membranes, pads, antibodies, and gold conjugates. We evaluated our POC-Tg kits on thirty clinical samples: 16 were found positive while the other 14 were seen as negative. All the negative and positive results were further validated by the attending clinical labs, resulting in 100% compatibility compared to the standard procedure. The proof-of-value of our POC-Tg test lies in its ability to significantly reduce the time to results, thus enhancing clinical decision-making, and saving time and valuable resources.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
7
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
13
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
14
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
25
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
27
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%
28
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%